Willa wrote:What if you had to choose between your head, your leg or your virginity?
I lost my virginity to your lass last week. She said it was the best 10 seconds she'd ever had. I'm always armless and usually legless too. Your point?
Joined: Jan 18 2005 Posts: 2361 Location: www.eastsidegym.co.uk
Jake the Peg wrote:I lost my virginity to your lass last week. She said it was the best 10 seconds she'd ever had. I'm always armless and usually legless too. Your point?
that's a shame my lass is a cross dressing trucker called dave. Probably was the best 10 seconds as we don't bother since he got diagnosed positive.
My point was that your selection was as obvious and pointless as mine.
“We will not accept a top eight finish as a barometer of supposed success at any point in the future whilst I am the owner of this club." Adam Pearson, FC Website 23-09-2011
Don't we get this 'make or break' talk every year from G.Horne? I think he's started reasonably well in the centres and he looks pretty comfortable, although when Motu and Raynor are back I would personally stick Briscoe in the centres and drop Horne to the bench. I don't think he's done anything wrong, I just think Briscoe offers more in attack tbh and looks like a safer pair of hands. I don't think you can say Briscoe is'nt ready for the centres because as far as I'm concerned, ''if your good enough your old enough'' and he certainly IS good enough. Graeme Horne's a solid defender and he's got got abit of pace but I just don't think he's any sort of threat going forward, and in a centre thats one thing you need. I wouldnt have any problems with him been utilised in the pack because he's a decent runner of the ball and he's definetly strong enough, however as I say I just don't think he is classy enough to play at centre.
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
Isn't it make or break for him every year?
Maybe a harsh question here, but if he was again offered only a 1-year extension, how many think he would actually be prepared to make the break away and move on?
His Hull career of the past few years has been a tale of convenience, really. He's cheap and versatile and doesn't seem to want to leave, so he gets to stay if we have cap space left and no better way to spend it. Likewise he hasn't had to move, or face the prospect of the challenge new surroundings bring, and he gets to stay with his brother. The fact that he's still a point of much debate about his first team credentials and seems to have pretty much progressed as far as he's going to IMO means this situation is justified, particularly now we have other prospects coming through. Stay or go, I can't say I'd be too bothered either way with him TBH.
Break.
I think he is a good centre, but not for hull. We should be utilising our wingers as much as possible, and i don't think he provides enough ball to Calderwood for what i have seen this season so far.
Craig Bellamy: "We're not boxers, we're footy players, and we've got to keep reminding ourselves of that. We're not too worried about getting bashed, believe me. We've got Michael Crocker."
whiplash wrote:Break. I think he is a good centre, but not for hull. We should be utilising our wingers as much as possible, and i don't think he provides enough ball to Calderwood for what i have seen this season so far.
...and by that trail of thought we should be getting rid of Yeaman too then.
Regarding G.Horne, well I personally rate the bloke. Fair enough he's not world class but he certainly doesn't let anybody down.
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 4390 Location: Posh Bransholme
Is defo a squad player and I would give him another year, but once Raynor is back, for me Briscoe should go right centre, but Horney good cover now we have lost Byrne.
Always the Optimist never the Pessimist. Glass Half full not half empty man me.
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
Mild mannered Janitor wrote:Nail, hammer, THWACK.
Modern day Rob Nolan / Chico Jackson
But one difference is that there wasn't a salary cap then.
I don't think many people think we need to get rid because he's poor, it's just a debatable point about whether or not we could use that part of our restricted funds more effectively.
carl_spackler wrote:But one difference is that there wasn't a salary cap then.
I don't think many people think we need to get rid because he's poor, it's just a debatable point about whether or not we could use that part of our restricted funds more effectively.
3 games in, and 3 wins to add. This sort of thing isn't something we should be worries about at this stage surely.
It just seems to me that people don't understand what squad means. They have 19 players in mind that appeal to them and the rest can go.
Our star signing has not and may not arrive, we've just had a player ruled out for the season and yet there doesnt seem to be panic anywhere. Thats testiment to the squad we've got and the reason the G.Hornes, Tommy Lees & Craig Halls are worth every penny.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum