RLFANS.COM -

Page 1 of 3

[ 26 posts ]

Go to page 1, 2, 3 Next

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

Post subject: Fielden cautioned

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:58 pm

Rogues Gallery

International Chairman

Joined: Oct 17 2002
Posts: 32357

http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php

SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS

For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.

For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.

Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row

Top

Post subject: Re: Fielden cautioned

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:02 pm

Th'Observer

Player Coach

Joined: Jul 18 2006
Posts: 4168
Location: Wigan

Rogues Gallery wrote:http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php

Seems a bit pedantic, which doesn't surprise me with it being the RFL :roll:

Rogues Gallery wrote:http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php

Seems a bit pedantic, which doesn't surprise me with it being the RFL :roll:

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:05 pm

Pie Eyed

International Chairman

Joined: Dec 22 2001
Posts: 3420
Location: At the match with Aoife on my shoulders

Are they all on holiday this week, and letting the secretaries run the disciplinary or something ???

12 incidents reviewed:
6 "No Charge" decisions
1 Formal caution
5 Warning letters

Not a single player brought in to Red Hall.

No trees were harmed during the creation of this post.
However, a number of electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
.
Saint94 wrote "Every team is in your feckin shadow....we all know." - Amen to that, brother
.
Saddened! wrote "We've got the worst backline in the competition, bar possibly London and Wakey. I'd swap our 1-7 with Salford in a heartbeat."

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:08 pm

Th'Observer

Player Coach

Joined: Jul 18 2006
Posts: 4168
Location: Wigan

Pie Eyed wrote:Are they all on holiday this week, and letting the secretaries run the disciplinary or something ???

12 incidents reviewed:
6 "No Charge" decisions
1 Formal caution
5 Warning letters

Not a single player brought in to Red Hall.

I think the RFL have gone over the top with doing things like this. Some of the things are completely harmless and accidental. If the RFL want to make a statement they need to harshly punish those players such as Westwood for wreckless challenges.

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:18 pm

Madderzahatter

International Board Member

Joined: Feb 14 2003
Posts: 1091
Location: In spitting distance of Twickenham - lucky me!

I think I remember the incident in question and i thought at the time his knee was very high...

'There's only one code of rugby.'

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:18 pm

Mr Potato Head

Player Coach

Joined: Mar 01 2009
Posts: 33

Unfortunately Fielden has previous for raising the knee. He is not on his own though both Peacock and Smith did it for Leeds v Manly.

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:25 pm

Rogues Gallery

International Chairman

Joined: Oct 17 2002
Posts: 32357

Slightly off topic, but I've just watched Saturdays game again.

The two penalties given against Fielden in the first half were completely wrong.
He was penalised for holding down at the play the ball.

In both instances the Harlequins player crawls or rolls forward after the tackle is complete, so that as Fielden gets up it looks as though he is preventing him from playing the ball.

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:30 pm

Bolton_Warrior

Player Coach

Joined: Mar 13 2008
Posts: 819
Location: Bolton

Rogues Gallery wrote:In both instances the Harlequins player crawls or rolls forward after the tackle is complete, so that as Fielden gets up it looks as though he is preventing him from playing the ball.

That seemed to be something Quins tried a lot in the game.

The ref imo could have penalised the Quins player for moving forward rather than Fielden.

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:31 pm

Mr Potato Head

Player Coach

Joined: Mar 01 2009
Posts: 33

Rogues Gallery wrote:Slightly off topic, but I've just watched Saturdays game again.

The two penalties given against Fielden in the first half were completely wrong.
He was penalised for holding down at the play the ball.

In both instances the Harlequins player crawls or rolls forward after the tackle is complete, so that as Fielden gets up it looks as though he is preventing him from playing the ball.

Disagree. Fielden and O Loughlin both need to stop messing at the play of the ball. We were lucky that the French referee was more lenient than other SL referees.

Top

Post subject:

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:36 pm

Pie Eyed

International Chairman

Joined: Dec 22 2001
Posts: 3420
Location: At the match with Aoife on my shoulders

Mr Potato Head wrote:Disagree. Fielden and O Loughlin both need to stop messing at the play of the ball. We were lucky that the French referee was more clueless than other SL referees.

Corrected for accuracy.

I sat through a 2 hour coaching session by listening in to the referees for that match.

He was constantly being corrected (including his tackle count - 3 times)

I'm sorry, but he is nowhere near Superleague standard, although I seem to recall hearing much the same with Ashley Klein when he first came over.