Joined: Jan 30 2009 Posts: 361 Location: a blacknwhite in the east
Credit where credit is due.You can only beat whats in front of you & they beat an unbelievably poor warrington side.I wouldnt pick a wakey player in any of my dream teams,but fair to them theyve started the season well.I thought theyed struggle
Joined: Oct 15 2004 Posts: 3629 Location: Dewsbury
Wes Hooligan wrote:Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.
You can only beat what's in front of you mate and if we can score 48 points without creating anything that can only be a good sign. To overcome the early loss of two hugely influential players and still win with any amount in hand is a credit to Kear and the players.
We may start to create a bit more when we have our 'creative' players on the park.. Brough, Leo-Latu, Grix, Rooney, Sculthorpe.. will all help us in that respect when they get back to match fitness.
Wes Hooligan wrote:Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.
You sad little bitter cretin. Crawl back under the stone from where you crawled.
Joined: Aug 17 2003 Posts: 17226 Location: South Wales
upthecats wrote:You can only beat what's in front of you mate and if we can score 48 points without creating anything that can only be a good sign. To overcome the early loss of two hugely influential players and still win with any amount in hand is a credit to Kear and the players.
We may start to create a bit more when we have our 'creative' players on the park.. Brough, Leo-Latu, Grix, Rooney, Sculthorpe.. will all help us in that respect when they get back to match fitness.
Yep, I would agree with that. I was happy Wakefield won tonight.
King Street Cat wrote:Some might look at this as being harsh but I think it's fair. When are the Rugby League going to stop persisting with this fantasy expansion. If it hasn't worked by now, it never will! I'm all for reaching out to a wider audience with our game but not at the expense of historical clubs in the homelands.
Wes Hooligan wrote:Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.
I can't help myself here..... Did you watch the game? Did you think about what you typed?
I know its different on telly sometimes, but we scored a hatful - with 1 recognised ball player for 60 odd mins, we had 2 men limp off early not to return. We completely dominated the first 20 mins or so, creating pressure that lead to (granted a fairly weak to start with) defense cracking. As has already been pointed out, you can only beat whats infront of you and tonight (as we have 2 other times this year so far) did with relative ease - all things considered.
We put this festival on you b*st*rds
With a lotta love
We worked for one year for you pigs
And you wanna break our walls down
And you wanna destroy us
Well you go to hell
Wes Hooligan wrote:Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.
wakey were different class tonight if it had not been for bentham warrington would have been nild did you go
Joined: Dec 29 2005 Posts: 2219 Location: Barnsley.
Wes Hooligan wrote:Wakefield hardly created anything, they just got near to the line and scored through p!ss-weak defence. The only good bit of play from Wakefield was George's try. It's fair enough that they never beat teams using skill or flair, because they are not good enough to do that, but to talk them up as 'creating a lot' is not accurate. They were simply not terrible. Warrington played as bad as I have seen a side play for a few years.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
