adam9641 wrote:So you are telling me what qualifications I don’t and don’t have?

Danril wrote:Thanks!

Seeing as you've been so gracious in my win I'm going to share it with you. The numbers will be 1,2,3,4,5 & 6. I'm not telling you when we win it though, so you'll have to enter those numbers every week until we do...

Danril wrote:No I'm telling you you're nuts, but I like you regardless!



Why else would I split a lottery win with you FFS? I think you're ace!

adam9641 wrote:I do Irish lottery instead

Durham Giant wrote:FFS there is one simple answer.


At the end of the season we can compare Wintersteins and Fultons stats and impact on the pitch. Then evidence will show if it was a good signing by either team.

other than that it is all hot air particularly as neither have played for either club and as far as i am aware is not even in the country at the minute

adam9641 wrote:You don't seem to understand that signing a player with bit potential is GOOD recruitment. It takes some explaining to you don't it

When FW comes over we will have around 8 overseas, which yeah is not ideal but I would rather have Winterstein in my team than someone else.

And I am very bright thanks, got more qualifications than you could dream of

chissitt wrote::CLAP: Well said DG your other 2 posts were spot on as well. One thing for sure your the only one talking any sense on this thread. By the way please dont use this on your sig

Marsdengiant wrote:No need, Lee

.

Quote:Marsdengian wrote
But do you include your own post?

If your post is not talking sense when saying DG is talking sense where does that leave DG's comments?

However if you think you talk sense then your post is inaccurate and you may be inaccurate about DG!

You are Socrates and I claim my £5!

Marsdengiant wrote:No need, Lee

Name any SL club that has signed a player and stated that he does NOT have potential.

And you would rather have FW than someone else! Fair enough

It is as well that you tell us you are bright. Your posts hide it very well.