Father Ted wrote: Tomkins should be left where he is for now.
Our team is missing a stand-off more than anything else at this moment. He will do the job nicely.
Father Ted wrote:Quins away is never easy and we don't want to give them extra targets to aim for than they've got already.
We've already discussed this at some length on another thread. He can't play at Quins cos its tricky. You didn't think he should play against Cas cos they have a big pack (smaller than Salfords by the way), etc. Sam has been a target in every game he's played and he'll be a target in every game he plays for the remainder of his career, so should we not play him at all?
Father Ted wrote:No point either as we play Bradford next week and Leeds the following game and he isn't going to play in those.
So if we look completely clueless in attack again this week, do we just hope for the best against Leeds and Bradford? This is the game to play him in because if he can come in and organise the attack and we look like we know what we're doing then he is a must for the Bradford and Leeds games.
Father Ted wrote:Play him off the bench v Salford away the week after Leeds. One or two may need a rest and that's when Tomkins should be introduced.
Need a rest? FFS! Who would need a rest after 6 matches? They might be looking for new clubs or adjusting to a new coach but they sure as hell shouldn't need a rest. What we need is some organisation and inspiration.
Father Ted wrote:A good away game where we may well win and if we don't the boo boys don't travel so he won't have to put up with that on his debut.
There will always be some idiots who boo at matches. I understand their frustration but if they think it will motivate a team that is playing badly then they're morons. Booing an under performing team is like pouring petrol on a fire to try and extinguish it.
A coach can't select his side on whether or not they can cope with being booed off.