Joined: Jan 16 2004 Posts: 3850 Location: To be confirmed
Albino Wolf 2 wrote:The fact that Westwood followed him to the ground and whispered something to the effect of "Have that" in is ear would appear to suggest some intent!!
It certainly won't help in his defence!!
And then straight to Carvell & slapped him on the chest & game a similar comment.
Rugby League is a hard, fast, contact sport played at professional level by athletic players.
In a sport with high speed collisions there will always be injuries and players take part with this knowledge.
Disciplinary system is not intended to sanitise the sport.
However there is no place in the game for players who jeopardise the safety of others by intentional, dangerous or malicious acts.
The disciplinary system must support and protect match officials
Rugby League is a hard, fast, contact sport played at professional level by athletic players.
In a sport with high speed collisions there will always be injuries and players take part with this knowledge.
Disciplinary system is not intended to sanitise the sport.
However there is no place in the game for players who jeopardise the safety of others by intentional, dangerous or malicious acts.
The disciplinary system must support and protect match officials
Not trying to defend Benny as it was a bad 'un, but when you think about it, the law of averages will dictate he is going to get the odd one wrong purely by the amount of tackling he does.
Didn't William Webb Ellis pick up the ball and run, someone should really tell Rugby Union.
Albino Wolf 2 wrote:The fact that Westwood followed him to the ground and whispered something to the effect of "Have that" in is ear would appear to suggest some intent!!
It certainly won't help in his defence!!
I never said he didn't intend to hit hard, it's about the intent to hit him straight in the mush. It's debatable whether at that time Westwood knew where he hit him, just that he hit him and he stayed down.
Just because Morley didn't go to ground and didn't give Fakir or anyone else the opportunity to whisper sweet nothings, does that imply there was less intent?
Bob Paisley wrote:A lot of teams beat us, do a lap of honour and don't stop running. They live too long on one good result. I remember Jimmy Adamson crowing after Burnley had beaten us once and that his players were in a different league. At the end of the season they were.
WireFanatic II wrote:Why, if it isn't Catalancs, RLFANS answer to a question no-one asked!
Joined: Apr 26 2005 Posts: 4190 Location: Under the thumb!
Why should any injury sustained to the tackled player have any relevance to the punishment? So in a hyperthetical match and all other things being hyperthetically equal...
Rob Burrow lands a high hit (assuming he could reach) on Carvell and although it was a comparitive tap he just manages to hit the 'sweet spot' and knock him out cold.
In the same hypethetical match, Morley hits Webb with everything, but Webb has a thick skull and although a little groggy manages to stay on his feet.
Should Burrow receive the greater punishment simply because his 'victim' had a 'glass jaw'?
Eddie Hemmings said not wrote:"Remember last time they were here, the Huddersfield Giants, they lost to a Luke Walsh drop goal. He's only scored four drop goals in his St Helens career has Luke Walsh and each and every one of them have been scored by Luke Walsh"
keithcun wrote:I never said he didn't intend to hit hard, it's about the intent to hit him straight in the mush. It's debatable whether at that time Westwood knew where he hit him, just that he hit him and he stayed down.
Just because Morley didn't go to ground and didn't give Fakir or anyone else the opportunity to whisper sweet nothings, does that imply there was less intent?
Sorry but thats rubbish. It was a shocker, it was deliberate and it was followed by a ridiculous episode of childish behaviour. I wasn't comparing it to any other incident. He should have been sent off and had he been I doubt we would have had "other incidents" to mention. Hopefully be will be punished accordingly, take his punishment like a man and perhaps in the future behave more like one!!
Albino Wolf 2 wrote:Sorry but thats rubbish. It was a shocker, it was deliberate and it was followed by a ridiculous episode of childish behaviour. I wasn't comparing it to any other incident. He should have been sent off and had he been I doubt we would have had "other incidents" to mention. Hopefully be will be punished accordingly, take his punishment like a man and perhaps in the future behave more like one!!
How can it be rubbish? Your opinion carries no greater susbtance than keith's. My snapshot view was that he caught the shoulder of Carlaw, then ended up catching him square in the face.
Didn't William Webb Ellis pick up the ball and run, someone should really tell Rugby Union.
getdownmonkeyman wrote:How can it be rubbish? Your opinion carries no greater susbtance than keith's. My snapshot view was that he caught the shoulder of Carlaw, then ended up catching him square in the face.
From a nuetrals point of view there was no 'shoulder' invovled.....it was straight in the mush......would expect a 3 game ban.
Joined: May 24 2006 Posts: 6406 Location: Warrington
getdownmonkeyman wrote:How can it be rubbish? Your opinion carries no greater susbtance than keith's. My snapshot view was that he caught the shoulder of Carlaw, then ended up catching him square in the face.
That is my opinion aswell TBH
JWP wrote:Smith> Jesus
boz the warrior wrote:lee briers is a nice person whoooo luck at lee forming a scrum the wire bum banger
Challenge Cup winners 2009, 2010 & 2012 League Leaders Shield 2011
getdownmonkeyman wrote:How can it be rubbish? Your opinion carries no greater susbtance than keith's. My snapshot view was that he caught the shoulder of Carlaw, then ended up catching him square in the face.
Look at it again then!
I didn't mean to belittle a post sorry so I apologise for using the word rubbish. But that was the worst I'd seen for a long time and to try and defend it my opinion is wrong.
Users browsing this forum: Gaz3376, Google Feedfetcher and 201 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
