ON/38/09 Ben Westwood Warrington Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/39/09 David Ferriol Catalans Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/40/09 Adam Mogg Catalans Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/41/09 Jamal Fakir Catalans Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/42/09 Remi Casty Catalans Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/43/09 Gareth Carvell Warrington Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
If you follow the link I've given, then click on each ref no. you can see that Westwood and Fakir have been charged whilst Ferriol, Mogg and Casty have not and Carvell has been cautioned.
Dawson wrote:Does Blyth have to face disciplinery action after slide tackling one of there try scorers
ON/38/09 Ben Westwood Warrington Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/39/09 David Ferriol Catalans Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/40/09 Adam Mogg Catalans Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/41/09 Jamal Fakir Catalans Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/42/09 Remi Casty Catalans Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
ON/43/09 Gareth Carvell Warrington Warrington v Catalans 21/02/09
If you follow the link I've given, then click on each ref no. you can see that Westwood and Fakir have been charged whilst Ferriol, Mogg and Casty have not and Carvell has been cautioned.
For those in the know, can someone explain the difference between the tackles of Westwood and Fakir. From what I saw, they both hit the opponent in the mush. Why is one graded higher than the other?
Bob Paisley wrote:A lot of teams beat us, do a lap of honour and don't stop running. They live too long on one good result. I remember Jimmy Adamson crowing after Burnley had beaten us once and that his players were in a different league. At the end of the season they were.
WireFanatic II wrote:Why, if it isn't Catalancs, RLFANS answer to a question no-one asked!
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 13723 Location: Warrington
keithcun wrote:For those in the know, can someone explain the difference between the tackles of Westwood and Fakir. From what I saw, they both hit the opponent in the mush. Why is one graded higher than the other?
Looking at the document, seems Fakir is accused of being reckless whilst Westwood of being intentional.
Again, as I said before, there didn't seem anymore intent in the Westwood tackle than the Fakir one. If I remember correctly, Westwoods head went past the right shoulder of Carlaw and his arm followed, he wasn't even looking at Carlaw when he hit him.
Of course, I'm not stupid enough to think that if he isn't looking he can't intend to do it, it's just that I can't understand how they can come to the conclusion that Westwood intended to smash him and Fakir didn't.
I suppose that's why they have a hearing to put there case.
On a side point, it always annoys me when Stevo says he didn't pull the ball out deliberately because he wasn't looking at it, as if a rugby player doesn't know what a ball feels like when he has his hand all over it.
Bob Paisley wrote:A lot of teams beat us, do a lap of honour and don't stop running. They live too long on one good result. I remember Jimmy Adamson crowing after Burnley had beaten us once and that his players were in a different league. At the end of the season they were.
WireFanatic II wrote:Why, if it isn't Catalancs, RLFANS answer to a question no-one asked!
Again, as I said before, there didn't seem anymore intent in the Westwood tackle than the Fakir one. If I remember correctly, Westwoods head went past the right shoulder of Carlaw and his arm followed, he wasn't even looking at Carlaw when he hit him.
Of course, I'm not stupid enough to think that if he isn't looking he can't intend to do it, it's just that I can't understand how they can come to the conclusion that Westwood intended to smash him and Fakir didn't.
I suppose that's why they have a hearing to put there case.
On a side point, it always annoys me when Stevo says he didn't pull the ball out deliberately because he wasn't looking at it, as if a rugby player doesn't know what a ball feels like when he has his hand all over it.
The fact that Westwood followed him to the ground and whispered something to the effect of "Have that" in is ear would appear to suggest some intent!!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 170 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
