*jonny* wrote:Do they employ any opticians in East Hull because i was laughing at the amount of times i heard "forward" coming from the stands. You're becoming St Helens.
Don't forget Boooooooooooooooooo
The fans may be becoming st helens but the team certainly isn't
Joined: Jun 12 2003 Posts: 4022 Location: Kingston Upon Hull (East)
Bighead wrote:rovers fans have become as embarrassing as saints fans
Still a long way to catch up to your set of post ripping, bus smashing idiots though!
As for the game, I though Leeds deserved it on the basis they had so many injuries, at least three top players missing through injury in the first place yet still managed to keep a defensive pattern any club in the world would have been proud of. Rovers were un-smart at times and clueless at others!!
You could see late on when Leeds were breaking the line we were tired yet I dont think we got a game ending injury all 80mins whereas Leeds' bench looked more like the start of Saving Private Ryan!!!! We should have taken advantage and been much better but as an optomistic kind of person I hope its just early season form that will get better as the pitches get dryer...etc!
nick hkr wrote:Still a long way to catch up to your set of post ripping, bus smashing idiots though!
DANNY LOCKWOOD - LEAGUE WEEKLY (18-5-09)
I'M SURE THERE IS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN THE FACT THAT THE FRONT RUNNERS FOR THE 2009 MEDIA WHINGING AWARD ARE FROM GATESHEAD AND HULL FC, FORMERLY THE B*ST*RD-TWINS OF ONE OF RUGBY LEAGUE'S LOUSIER IDEAS.
SmokeyTA wrote:i wasnt happy to see Sinfield lose his rag a bit, but Bentham had a mare last night, i thought he was appalling
I know how he missed Ablett's forearm smash int Websters nose is beyond me.
Suprised youve not mentioned that as I know how much you detest such actions
[quote='Fishsta"']I've always thought of McGuire as a good player, and I wouldn't normally wish injury on any player, but there was a certain hint of poetic justice to that.
[/quote]
Another classic:
[quote='Fishsta']You forgot to take off the "Saints Reduction Factor" when calculating the ban.
Standard suspension / Saints Reduction Factor = Actual ban for Saints player.
Therefore (2 / 3) = 0.666
0.666 < 1 therefore actual ban equals "less than 1 match".
Don Brennan wrote:I know how he missed Ablett's forearm smash int Websters nose is beyond me. Suprised youve not mentioned that as I know how much you detest such actions
you big girl
perfectly legal nothing in it at all, you see 10 of those a game
and it wasnt even his forearm which made contact, it was his upper arm
//www.pngnrlbid.com
bUsTiNyAbALLs wrote:Do not converse with me you filthy minded deviant.
vastman wrote:My rage isn't impotent luv, I'm frothing at the mouth actually.
Joined: Apr 28 2007 Posts: 2267 Location: A Galaxy Far, Far Away...
Bighead wrote:rovers fans have become as embarrassing as saints fans
Nice avatar!
i hate pies wrote:hull kr fans are fine, real good. its the fc fans that worry me.
berro's best mate wrote:all joking aside our club is a mess, a farce, a laughing stock.....due mainly to our inept board at the helm, one of which rapes and pilages its riches for its own greed.........quite clearly rule and hetherington are not upto the job, what the hell is going on?? performances are now at a stage of utter decline, our players are looking as though they dont even want to be on the pitch let alone to be associated with hull fc.... im taking this opptunity for anyone with a heart and a big wallet to save hull fc from these two muppets before its to late... a club which charges the most in super league to watch complete rubbish, PLEASE PLEASEPLEASE help this once famous club regain its feet by buying out these complete greedy,clueless morons before its too late....
perfectly legal nothing in it at all, you see 10 of those a game
and it wasnt even his forearm which made contact, it was his upper arm
Duly noted.
[quote='Fishsta"']I've always thought of McGuire as a good player, and I wouldn't normally wish injury on any player, but there was a certain hint of poetic justice to that.
[/quote]
Another classic:
[quote='Fishsta']You forgot to take off the "Saints Reduction Factor" when calculating the ban.
Standard suspension / Saints Reduction Factor = Actual ban for Saints player.
Therefore (2 / 3) = 0.666
0.666 < 1 therefore actual ban equals "less than 1 match".
Kosh wrote:Credit to Leeds for dragging the game back from the brink in the face of a lot of injuries and a huge penalty count against them.
Just wondered if you credited Rovers in last weeks match at Bradfud for dragging the game from the brink despite the big penalty count in the Bulls favour.....or is it just an obsession with HKR.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
