THE BOARD wrote:Well if you can read then my point is there to be read !
To put it into simple terms for you IMO its clear to see we have the three afor mentioned players who are all obviously cack under the high ball.
Although only one of the three played against Wigan I just thought Wigan concentrated on the high ball against us instead of the low grubber.
Just a thought but it got me thinking teams are maybe going to target us in this area knowing we struggle under the bomb as both tries showed the other night.
Like I said its just a thought and maybe I will be wrong. I was merley asking if they practiced these kind of things in training and if not why not !

ash4hullfc wrote:Richards is one of, if not the best, taker of the high ball in the league, especially in attack. Smith's kick to him was also pinpoint. Not much Calderwood could have done about it in all honesty, you just have to sit back and admire.

ash4hullfc wrote:Richards is one of, if not the best, taker of the high ball in the league, especially in attack. Smith's kick to him was also pinpoint. Not much Calderwood could have done about it in all honesty, you just have to sit back and admire.

THE BOARD wrote:Did anyone notice that both Wigan tries the other night came from high kicks to the corner

Yeamo wrote:I thought Raynor was pretty solid under the high ball?

Mild mannered Janitor wrote:I wouldn't be overtly worried, its just one of those things.

The Kings of Hull wrote:Given the fact that only 1 of the 3 players you mention played on Friday I really don't see your point.