I heard that they were assisted / funded / sponsored by the Welsh tourist board.They have seen how well Catalan have done and how much money has been brought into the local economy by the travelling fans and realised if their team can get in SL look how well the local economy will benefit.
But granted there is a slight difference from Canet Plage and Brigend !!!!!!!
Joined: Aug 17 2003 Posts: 17226 Location: South Wales
Fred Gee wrote:I heard that they were assisted / funded / sponsored by the Welsh tourist board.They have seen how well Catalan have done and how much money has been brought into the local economy by the travelling fans and realised if their team can get in SL look how well the local economy will benefit.
But granted there is a slight difference from Canet Plage and Brigend !!!!!!!
That was the Millennium Magic weekend, not the Crusaders.
King Street Cat wrote:Some might look at this as being harsh but I think it's fair. When are the Rugby League going to stop persisting with this fantasy expansion. If it hasn't worked by now, it never will! I'm all for reaching out to a wider audience with our game but not at the expense of historical clubs in the homelands.
Post subject: Re: Eddie "theres lovely, boyo, daf-o-dil" Hemmings
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:24 am
chissitt
Player Coach
Joined: Oct 07 2007 Posts: 11580
Wes Hooligan wrote:So are you suggesting that Leighton Samuels works for, or 'is' the RFL? Or that Celtic were 'guaranteed a franchise by super league', despite the fact that 'Super League' refers to majority decisions made by the club chairmen, and that they were not responsible for the licencing decisions? If so have you any evidence to back this up, or are you just going to come up with some more hilarious jokes about 'ventrilaquists'?
I am not suggesting anything because off hand I do not have an opinion on it but Kinleycat does. He is a Wakey fan on the Wakey board and is entitled to his opinion. You obviously dont agree with him, but you dont seem to have the mentality to put forward a rational argument against him so you do the usual thing and hurl abuse. If you want to hear people generally talking out of their @rses' I could suggest a couple of boards to go on but being an expert you probably know who they are anyway
Post subject: Re: Eddie "theres lovely, boyo, daf-o-dil" Hemmings
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:27 am
Marsdengiant
Player Coach
Joined: Sep 23 2008 Posts: 1977
chissitt wrote:I am not suggesting anything because off hand I do not have an opinion on it but Kinleycat does. He is a Wakey fan on the Wakey board and is entitled to his opinion. You obviously dont agree with him, but you dont seem to have the mentality to put forward a rational argument against him so you do the usual thing and hurl abuse. If you want to hear people generally talking out of their @rses' I could suggest a couple of boards to go on but being an expert you probably know who they are anyway
WH has tended to keep things factual.
Some posters state opinions as if they were facts - common among people with limited intelligence. When challenged to produce anything factual these people often resort to rumour or childish conspiracy theories.
WH did not challenge an opinion that was anti Crusaders. he challenged the claim that the RFL bankrolled the Crusaders and guarenteed them a place in SL. So if WH is wrong where is the evidence backing the bankrolling statement?
Post subject: Re: Eddie "theres lovely, boyo, daf-o-dil" Hemmings
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:48 am
TURFEDOUT
Player Coach
Joined: May 31 2005 Posts: 2990
Marsdengiant wrote:WH has tended to keep things factual.
Some posters state opinions as if they were facts - common among people with limited intelligence. When challenged to produce anything factual these people often resort to rumour or childish conspiracy theories.
WH did not challenge an opinion that was anti Crusaders. he challenged the claim that the RFL bankrolled the Crusaders and guarenteed them a place in SL. So if WH is wrong where is the evidence backing the bankrolling statement?
I hope to God the RFL arent bank rolling them.
They are already starting to amass County Court Judgements - one awarded against them in Jan 09 ,jeez before the season even started.
Post subject: Re: Eddie "theres lovely, boyo, daf-o-dil" Hemmings
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:18 am
Schunter
Player Coach
Joined: Apr 06 2006 Posts: 4980
Marsdengiant wrote:WH has tended to keep things factual.
Some posters state opinions as if they were facts - common among people with limited intelligence. When challenged to produce anything factual these people often resort to rumour or childish conspiracy theories.
WH did not challenge an opinion that was anti Crusaders. he challenged the claim that the RFL bankrolled the Crusaders and guarenteed them a place in SL. So if WH is wrong where is the evidence backing the bankrolling statement?
some posters make smug remarks to make themselves look intelligent - common amongst posters who are bell ends
'That is why no amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party.... So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin'
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
