About 30 seconds tops and he got up and ran back into the defensive line when he realised he wasnt getting a penalty.

Rovers play Saints next week.

Morrison was quite clearly groggy for a while after the hit. I said at the time if the KR attack had any sense then they'd run at him, only they didn't.

http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... 91,00.html how about this for how diff clubs seem to fair at disciplinary panel

http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... 91,00.html how about this for how diff clubs seem to fair at disciplinary panel

Out of interest, have you seen the Bailey offence? I haven't by the way.

Clearly the disciplinary panel were not of the opnion that both were guilty of the same offence, if having seen both incidents you disagree that the two were in fact different then thats one thing but clearly the panel disagree.

Walker was found guilty of striking with a raised forearm, Bailey, it appears, was guilty of having a raised forearm/elbow but not striking. The difference, in the opinion of the panel, is clear for all to see.

As above, if you have seen both and think that either Bailey was guilty of striking or that walker was not, fine, but they they have been adjudged to be 'guilty' of different offences, hence the difference in sentence.

Further evidence that everyone hates hull kr. Long may it continue

100% record for Wigan.

We always seem to get stiffed by the panel so I'm not surprised. good thing is we have an even better player to replace him!

The link a few posts up shows that to be completely untrue.


If he was better, surely he would have been picked in the first place.

And a quick calculation done when bored at work:

Percentage of games banned for in relation to players referred to disciplinary panel:

Wakefield - 4 times referred, 8 matches banned: 200%
Castleford - 5 times referred, 8 matches banned: 160%
Wigan - 12 times referred, 12 matches banned: 100%
St Helens - 3 times referred, 3 matches banned: 100%
Quins - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89%
Catalans - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89%
Hudds - 7 times referred, 6 matches banned: 86%
Warrington - 10 times referred, 8 matches banned: 80%
Leeds - 8 times referred, 5 matches banned: 63%
Bradford - 5 times referred, 3 matches banned: 60%
Hull KR - 11 times referred, 4 matches banned: 36%
Hull FC - 2 times referred, 0 matches banned: 0%

They're out to get us I swear...