twangedmoneymonk wrote:Can't argue with the detail in that.
We're the first ones to starve, we're the first ones to die The first ones in line for that pie-in-the-sky And we're always the last when the cream is shared out For the worker is working when the fat cat's about
I mentioned this on the Matt King thread (nothing to do with Matt King but hey). The annoying thing about Price knee'ing Hicks in the head was the linesman was stood less than a metre from the incident and did nothing.
Joined: Jul 22 2008 Posts: 16170 Location: Somewhere other than here
Paul2812 wrote:I mentioned this on the Matt King thread (nothing to do with Matt King but hey). The annoying thing about Price knee'ing Hicks in the head was the linesman was stood less than a metre from the incident and did nothing.
Was it deliberate or did he just fall badly? I didn't see it at the match and didn't notice it when I watched it back on Sky. If it was deliberate then he should have been bolloxed; if not - well, hey ho. It's not nice but things like that happen in rugby league.
SaintsFan wrote:Was it deliberate or did he just fall badly? I didn't see it at the match and didn't notice it when I watched it back on Sky. If it was deliberate then he should have been bolloxed; if not - well, hey ho. It's not nice but things like that happen in rugby league.
How did you not see it on Sky ? Watch it again..... pretty hard to miss.
As for whether it was deliberate, I'd say it was. Possibly an attemted flop to slow the play down, but he still connected with the side of Hick's head.
The problem with Pryce is he seems to do stupid things in games that lets him down ie, feeling up other players. Its either that and he's a bit bent and just fancied copping a feel of Burgess's nads ? Who can say ?
Early on in the game, one of your players, might of been Hicks, did the same to Armstrong ... Maybe Pryce was looking after him, seemed to do the same last year, looking after a youngster that is.
Saint Ryan wrote:Early on in the game, one of your players, might of been Hicks, did the same to Armstrong ... Maybe Pryce was looking after him, seemed to do the same last year, looking after a youngster that is.
Was he attacked by Burgess' balls?
We're the first ones to starve, we're the first ones to die The first ones in line for that pie-in-the-sky And we're always the last when the cream is shared out For the worker is working when the fat cat's about
Saint Ryan wrote:Early on in the game, one of your players, might of been Hicks, did the same to Armstrong ... Maybe Pryce was looking after him, seemed to do the same last year, looking after a youngster that is.
This is correct. It was Hicks. Hicks just got a bit wound up by being owned by a fresh faced teenager on debut.
Wigan RLFC - The Biggest Laughing stock in the history of Rugby League.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
it is difficult to see what is happening.
