FekaTheBeast wrote:The fact is that I've managed to make a pretty decent team from players we offloaded to other teams and become a success.
No, you've made a very poor team from eleven players we sold to other teams and six (Goulding, O'Loughlin, Fielden, J.Tomkins, S.Tomkins and Hansen) who still play for us.
FekaTheBeast wrote:Luke Robinson is better than Leuluai.
I disagree, he had the potential to be a great player but has done nothing since he left. If he was as good as Leuluai he'd be chasing Burrow for an England scrum half spot.
FekaTheBeast wrote:Oh and forgot about Danny Orr too, he was a class player and he got rid of him.
I liked Orr to be honest, but he was replaced by Trent Barrett, a far superior player. I think Smith is a better player too.
FekaTheBeast wrote:Also, Danny Tickle, he is far better than Phil Bailey is.
Tickle was horrific in his last season for us. Ok he looked a lot better on Friday but we couldn't wait for his form would pick up. Bailey today > Tickle in 2006.
FekaTheBeast wrote:And are you saying that you'd rather have mathers or even that usless peice of so and so Roberts at Full-Back?
Briscoe is a good player but we hd Radlinski at full back at the time so he had no chance. Roberts isn't useless at all and you wouldn't be saying he was if he was English. Granted Mathers is terrible though, the sooner he's sold to Widnes the better.