Joined: Apr 25 2002 Posts: 8138 Location: By The Cemetry Gates, Sintellins.
No1_Saints _Fan wrote:Maurie needs one good game and he will became the animal he once was. As for Frodsham, he isn't ready yet. Sam Burgess proved that.
Why ? There have been plenty of established players whacked by a big hit over the years. I dont see how it ' proves' anything.
Joined: Feb 09 2005 Posts: 2928 Location: Somerset
Harborne Saint wrote:I wouldn't write him off but he needs to improve discipline and solidity. Our squad's thinness means he needs to be more than just an impact layer
Maybe that is the problem, he is playing as a "normal" prop, getting through graft for longish spells, as opposed to coming on as an impact player for a few minutes, and causing some real damage?
Joined: Mar 30 2002 Posts: 25689 Location: The posh end of Newton
SomersetSaint wrote:Maybe that is the problem, he is playing as a "normal" prop, getting through graft for longish spells, as opposed to coming on as an impact player for a few minutes, and causing some real damage?
I agree. He was bigger, stronger and played less minutes in 2006. That's when Maurie was at his best. We've got Graham, Cayless and Hargreaves who all offer workrate. We need Maurie to play for 25-30 minutes maximum and offer big impact.
[quote="Meyt N Prater Pie"]I think I hate wigan.[/quote]
Joined: Aug 05 2002 Posts: 14094 Location: He can smoke a pound in a single bound!
Fa'asavalau didn't have that bad a game on Friday made one high tackle and missed a couple, but that's going off memory. We may have to get used to him not playing as much as an impact prop as he has done previously, the fact that he had 3 or 4 tacklers on him whenever he made a run didn't help, he also played when Warrington were at their best defensively. Hargreaves was a bit of a worry, IIRC he only played the firs 15-20 minutes, was he injured? Potter didn't mention him as such in the post match interview
And those jumping on the 'Burgess showed Frodsham not to be ready' bandwagon, what about the other 6 games he played in SL last year where he made an average of 8 metres per carry?
Do you actually watch the games or just remember the highlights at the end of the tv coverage?
I'm not Jesus Christ, I've come to accept that now.
[quote][b]XBrettKennyX wrote:[/b] Once more the anti SC brigade, purposely or otherwise fail to see the point.
Billinge_Lump wrote:Fa'asavalau didn't have that bad a game on Friday made one high tackle and missed a couple, but that's going off memory. We may have to get used to him not playing as much as an impact prop as he has done previously, the fact that he had 3 or 4 tacklers on him whenever he made a run didn't help, he also played when Warrington were at their best defensively. Hargreaves was a bit of a worry, IIRC he only played the firs 15-20 minutes, was he injured? Potter didn't mention him as such in the post match interview
And those jumping on the 'Burgess showed Frodsham not to be ready' bandwagon, what about the other 6 games he played in SL last year where he made an average of 8 metres per carry?
Do you actually watch the games or just remember the highlights at the end of the tv coverage?
Superb post..
The Frodsham / Burgess tackle was about 8 months ago & is getting very boring now Or shall we all talk about the Vinnie Anderson hit on Danny Tickle Maurie is attracting 3 defenders every time he gets the ball, cause teams know how dangerous he can be. Maurie is still a beast & every other team in SL would love to have him in thier squad
www.euronics.co.uk fail to prepare, prepare to fail
impossible is nothing
The Frodsham / Burgess tackle was about 8 months ago & is getting very boring now Or shall we all talk about the Vinnie Anderson hit on Danny Tickle Maurie is attracting 3 defenders every time he gets the ball, cause teams know how dangerous he can be. Maurie is still a beast & every other team in SL would love to have him in thier squad
I agree I would welcome him at Odsal. He can be very dangerous in attack and occasionally even looks a little Vagana-esque
Joined: Aug 08 2002 Posts: 17417 Location: Better living through chemistry.
I think the reason for his so-called lack of form is two-fold;
One, he's had a series of niggling injuries over the past 2 seasons and it's plain to see it has affected his form and secondly, if players wind him up and get in to his face then the red mist descends and he becomes ineffective.
Give him some time this season as well as a long, unbroken run in the team, and he'll be back to his best.
Tweet from @martinoffiah 23/08/2011: 'Must admit i did love watching Saints- Cunningham Joynt Longy Tommy then Leon, last classic RL team ever'. Even the dark side can't help but love the rebellion.
Joined: Oct 08 2004 Posts: 1649 Location: The South
Like a lot of players in al clubs the first hit out is wht most really need, I hope he will regain his form soon, as alrady stated hes an impact player and we need him.
Joined: Jun 29 2005 Posts: 10399 Location: Awaiting a ban.
Maurie might not be pulling up trees, but he's far from a waste of a shirt.
He was playing against one of the best sets of props in the league, don't forget.
I too expect Frodsham to come through and take a shirt of one of the current props, but I don't reckon it'll be Maurie.
[url=www.cater-bake.co.uk]Cater-Bake UK - Pizza and Bakery Equipment Specialists[/url]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 139 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
