Well that can't be true; if Long had brought his kicking boots we could have lost the game 36-14. It was six tries to two!

We were closer last season.

I never said that, I said potential top 3 ( ie I can see you finishing 3rd pretty comfortably and if Briers can learn to control the tempo of the play then I think you would be very tough to beat in a one off game).

The only issue for me Warrington have is that it always seems to be all or nothing. Its have a go regardless of time, position etc. Watch last night again, Saints did what Saints do generally. Everyone raves about how good Saints are yet they never mention that Saints tend to play in bursts. Its always very simple rugby for the main parts with one out runs either through the pack or from dummy half. Every now and then they will put a move on through the backs or have Pryce coming in around the ruck. However, when Saints do go for it, then it is all in with just about everybody pushing forward. This is what Warrington need to learn for me. You have the pack to maintain territorial advantage against anyone througout. Just play straight for long periods, defend in unison and every so often bring Gleeson, King, Penny and Riley into the game.

I genuinely don't think Warrington are far off either of the top 2. The amount of negativity on here is madness considering how you just totally dominated Saints on their own ground for most of the game.

I thought we were good for the first 50 minutes playing a no risk game down the middle of the field. The problem was that most of our team seemed to run out of energy after 60 minutes IMO.

Seemed to be missing a bit of flare as Briers didn't really do anything special, but at least he noticable unlike Monaghan.

Riley showed up well making a great offload for the try, but getting stopped relatively easy on some attacking runs. I am a big fan of Riley after the way he finished last season but it will be interesting to see how he holds up to one on one situations if our line get broke (can't see too many tadulala tackles) and what he is like under bombs.

I was slightly worried by Harrison, he did do alright to be fair but was risking giving away flops IMO.

We did really well in completing our sets but I thought the big difference was that Saints defence was better and I can't remember them not completing a set in the final 30 minutes.

It wasnt the fitness at all in my opinion.
it was the groundwork in the tackle that let them back into it. saints got back to back quick play the balls that just put us into scramble mode. We hardly had the ball second half due to knock ons from the likes of carvell, harrison and morley put us under to much presure. completion rate was awsome first half...terrible second half. kicking game, great first half...rubbish second!
WE should have put them to bed after that great defensive set on there line in second half!

Well said, thanks