Joined: Jan 29 2003 Posts: 1677 Location: Kirkella, Hull
trys'r'us wrote:He was solid enough, as always, but, as always, didn't offer much going forwards. It was noticeable how we struggled to clear our own end, especially early on before Wigan tired, without Tony and Raynor.
It's unfortunate for Byrne, who always gives his all and rarely lets the team down, but I can't see how he'll get a spot in the 17 when all are fit. His versatility might make him worthy of a bench spot, but I'd much rather have four forwards.
Have to disagree his support play was much improved tonight and tony would not have got past the first defender as wigan moved up in 3 and 4's tony is good at getting past the first defender but, the way wigan moved up tonight would not have made the slighest bit of difference.
Come to think of it yes it would actually we would of been 3 tries down and lost the game.
Thank god for a defensive fullback!!!!!!!
SPONSORED BY KAREN WARK No. 9 THE BEST HOOKER IN TOWN!!!! 2009 SEASON
Coach No.1
Irregulars Player Of The Year 2004
and Top Try Scorer 2004
People may doubt what you say, but they will always believe what you do.
Joined: Jan 30 2003 Posts: 2476 Location: South Cave, East Yorkshire
I was a few feet away from Skinny's hit in the SE corner waiting to put a sub on the pitch and I have never heard such a bonecrunching hit from someone so Skinny. It allowed Briscoe and others to bundle the defender out of play.
Mick Cranes Sidestep wrote:I was a few feet away from Skinny's hit in the SE corner waiting to put a sub on the pitch and I have never heard such a bonecrunching hit from someone so Skinny. It allowed Briscoe and others to bundle the defender out of play.
all 12 players came over the pat him on the back too, showed good team spirit and you can tell the rest of the guys really appreciated the hit, was as good as scoring a try.
Joined: Mar 03 2004 Posts: 5397 Location: West Hull
Robbo4 wrote:Thought he was solid in defense but really offered very little going forward.
Which is what he'll offer every week. For me, that's not enough at this level, especially for a side that's not overly blessed with creativity.
dave m wrote:Briscoe couldn't get into Wigans Team because of Radlinski even though Radlinski was playing crap at the time still better than old bent nose.
redtillimdead wrote:Oh and as for Briscoe,if he was that fab,why did Wigan see fit to let him leave?
Joined: Jan 23 2006 Posts: 15980 Location: Boulevard with my balls of steel!
trys'r'us wrote:Which is what he'll offer every week. For me, that's not enough at this level, especially for a side that's not overly blessed with creativity.
Couldn't agree more. If we was a bit stronger and/or a bit faster then it might be a different matter. Nothing against the lad but he is a cover player IMO.
People are over-rating "try saving tackles". He's the full back its his job. The one in South West corner, fair enough, great tackle, that was a legitimate try saver. Couldn't agree more with trys`r`us and Robbo, he's a handy back-up player but doesn't offer enough to warrant a starting spot anywhere in the back line.
Users browsing this forum: ComeOnYouUll and 153 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
