No.

He's waiting for you to provide proof that Leeds want Atkins.

The truth is, they did but have now realised he's crap.

Ok, if they did you give him the proof

No problem mate,Belle vue,in front of the Sky screen,feel free to move away from the mouse!!!

Creates quite a few tries does Scully.

You did well agaisnt our academy tonight

and dont be mad coz you did not get Atkins, just make do with Watkins instead.

£20 to stand at Leeds!

mwildcats wrote:
the replacements that leeds had to cover there injuries far outweigh in quality wise the replacements we had for our injuries,

to be fair its easier to replace your regular poop with more poop than it is to replace internationals

Dirty Pretty Thing got it spot on.

And they do realize that despite missing Sinfield and Burrow, Leeds had 11 players who came through the academy in the 17.

Wakefield, despite so called missing all their players, had 4. And they expect sympaphy.

Might be a bit harsh on the bloke because he's hardly stayed at a club long enough to nurture some home grown talent, but has Kear ever presided over a club where home-grown talent is the norm, or like Noble does he prefer to buy his ready made team in using someone else's money and hard work ?

apart from Sheffield of course...

We shall see.