Live Wired wrote:Quite a simple game to work out tonight. Take 1 team that regulary wins trophies or finishes runners up against another team that regulary struggles to finish in the top 6,has not won a trophy since the mid 90s,has an aging team and has a habit of playing players in the wrong position.Put this together and the bookies handicap of -8 is quite simply wrong,it should be double that.
St Helens -8 is generally available
May aswell try for a 3rd time,even though the above statement,has nothing to do with this thread.
Live Wired wrote:Quite a simple game to work out tonight. Take 1 team that regulary wins trophies or finishes runners up against another team that regulary struggles to finish in the top 6,has not won a trophy since the mid 90s,has an aging team and has a habit of playing players in the wrong position.Put this together and the bookies handicap of -8 is quite simply wrong,it should be double that.
St Helens -8 is generally available
May aswell try for a 3rd time,even though the above statement,has nothing to do with this thread.
If you did that same bet on the 4 games last season against them you would have lost everytime.
Joined: Jun 09 2005 Posts: 13916 Location: Not getting away with murder anymore
Live Wired wrote:Obviously you dont keep records,but -8 was certainly not available on all 4 games last year.
I think he means that all 4 games last season would have lost you a bet with -8.
Union is played by people who close airports after a bit of snow, League is played by people who would go and have a snowball fight with a 747
loyal18 wrote:sorry but warrington/hudds = lucky win defo should of been saints/wigan final the fact is saints n wigan were extremely tired from the week before we both gave our all ahh well only challenge cup. grand final is the big one ahah anyway good luck in final hudds hope u stuff wire
gordon bennett,the point is that the handicap mark is wrong,thats why i say that saints -8 is the bet.if the hc was saints -28 and my mark said it should be -16,then obviously wire on the hc would be the bet
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 13723 Location: Warrington
Live Wired wrote:gordon bennett,the point is that the handicap mark is wrong,thats why i say that saints -8 is the bet.if the hc was saints -28 and my mark said it should be -16,then obviously wire on the hc would be the bet
No, the point you were making is that on past history, Saints should beat us by more than 8, therefore you think people should bet on Saints tonight. Whearas, last season (when past history was similar, in fact worse), betting on Saints with a -8 handicap would have seen you lose all 4 bets.
Live Wired wrote:gordon bennett,the point is that the handicap mark is wrong,thats why i say that saints -8 is the bet.if the hc was saints -28 and my mark said it should be -16,then obviously wire on the hc would be the bet
do you see why we don't have(possibly need)a regular betting thread on here.
Unless it's latchford wolves fan bragging about being good at something
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
