Joined: Apr 22 2008 Posts: 1362 Location: High on a hill
GJB wrote:And that probably shows you how much interest I have in the guy.
Best not to post on things that you don't understand,must have been in a time warp not to know he was one of the cities finest.But if you have'nt been going long, well that's a different matter.
DABHAND wrote:Best not to post on things that you don't understand,must have been in a time warp not to know he was one of the cities finest.But if you have'nt been going long, well that's a different matter.
I'm aware he was a great player for FC, can't say I've researched much else about the guy. I wasn't watching the game when he was in his prime!
GJB wrote:I'm aware he was a great player for FC, can't say I've researched much else about the guy. I wasn't watching the game when he was in his prime!
Just to make sure, you do know that Roger Millward wasn't a 'ull lad don't you?
deafo1 wrote:from what i've been hearing Rovers cited a club for an illegal approach to Crooks before allowing him to leave. Could be an interesting twist to this one !
Lets hope Neil Hudgell doesn't use the " We have six years to pursue it" get out clause.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
cofr_rockin_robin wrote:NH summed it up at the forum tonight , are we bovvered
My, Rovers have wasted some cash - a year of Crooks, 6 months of Blanchard, could have paid for a pre-season trip to Dubai had it not been for those poor recruitment decisions.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
well that's a different matter.
