Joined: Oct 02 2007 Posts: 5678 Location: Where ever the wind blows me.
Wouldn't mind Wild or Purdham.
Although we would need a bring in a quality centre to replace Gleeson, as you don't get many centres as good as Gleeson in SL. We'd miss him.
And Although Lockyer would be great signing, he won't be here in SL for 3 or 4 years, he'd be more of a stop gap rather than replacing Briers. I'd like to us aim for a younger/promising player to enable him to blend into the squad, (as we did with Briers) i think thats what you need in such as pivotal position. You can't to sign a player these days and expect him to settle in straight away.
With Gleeson's salary cap space freed up, possibly Briers leaving as well and other imports like Rauhihi, Hicks and Anderson off contract, we should target at least one of these big names for 2010. I hope Moran pulls out all the stops and offers them a package they cant turn down. A 300k a year deal, sponsored car and house in Stozza Heath should clinch it!
Hunt would be my first choice, he is younger and we need a full back desperately.
Either Marshall or Lockyer would do to replace Briers. Marshall has time on his side though and Lockyer would be a short term fix, but the most likely to be tempted over.
Thoughts?
!!!!
Casual Des wrote:3 names should be on Moran's hitlist for 2010
With Gleeson's salary cap space freed up, possibly Briers leaving as well and other imports like Rauhihi, Hicks and Anderson off contract, we should target at least one of these big names for 2010. I hope Moran pulls out all the stops and offers them a package they cant turn down. A 300k a year deal, sponsored car and house in Stozza Heath should clinch it!
Hunt would be my first choice, he is younger and we need a full back desperately.
Either Marshall or Lockyer would do to replace Briers. Marshall has time on his side though and Lockyer would be a short term fix, but the most likely to be tempted over.
Joined: Feb 09 2008 Posts: 9342 Location: King George Dock
Teddington Wire wrote:Dan Carter; Sam Burgess; Kirk Yeoman.
First two fairly obvious. Yeoman can be the best centre in the competition if he got fit and back to the form of 2007. May just need a change of environment. Can easily fil the boots of Gleeson though, and we can't rely constantly on overseas players. We have to buy british at some point.
For a start it's Yeaman, not Yeoman or Yeamen.
Secondly, Kirk has quoted in the daily mail. That he feels fitter than ever before and it was 2006 when he was showing his class.
Tbh I can't see Yeaman leaving Hull at all, I think he will be a one club man. Yeaman is suited to the left more, he often uses a stiff arm to stop the opposition and to great affect most times. Unfortunately he just needs to pass to his winger more often.
"You don't have to be great to start, but to be great you have to start".
A unknown superstar wrote:For a start it's Yeaman, not Yeoman or Yeamen.
Secondly, Kirk has quoted in the daily mail. That he feels fitter than ever before and it was 2006 when he was showing his class.
Tbh I can't see Yeaman leaving Hull at all, I think he will be a one club man. Yeaman is suited to the left more, he often uses a stiff arm to stop the opposition and to great affect most times. Unfortunately he just needs to pass to his winger more often.
Can he have his hook back, please?
We're the first ones to starve, we're the first ones to die The first ones in line for that pie-in-the-sky And we're always the last when the cream is shared out For the worker is working when the fat cat's about
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
!!!!
