Nope Mimmis represents both Kimmorley and Dykes so he was playing them against each other when dealing with the club. When Sherwin was 'officially' available a time limit got put in place for us to offer Dykes a deal which we did.

fair point mate.

you just seem very negative thats all,give agar and the lads a chance.a ball has even been kicked yet,i just think agar and sharp will prove many supporters wrong,your entitled to your opinions.

Sorry..i bow to your superior knowledge of the grat game that is played in OZ......where is Sherwin again...

Cooke had left and we went for Monaghan first didnt we?

read my last post

Where is Matty Head btw

I actually forgot about Monaghan but i think us missing out on him was more to do with us not been able to match the spending power of Wire.

I arent that quick at reading and typing...

Horne, while 7 isn't his best position, has proved he can play at 7 more than Thorman has proved he can. Thorman has started 5 games at 7 since coming back from Aus for the 2005 season, so not sure how you can use that arguement. Plus, Agar played Radford at 13 a lot last year and imo that really is a crap position for him.
And saying you will trust him. Well you have just slagged off the signing of Dykes, would you say that Sharp was right in signing him? Or would you stick to your opinion on the player as one of the people in the crowd?

Correct and tbh,he wasnt much cop was he.

course it matters we needed someone to partner horne so agar got thorman on a 1 year deal which i think is a good move,if he has a good season then he will get another deal if not then he goes,who else would partner horne all next season