thehullwhitestar wrote:Apart from a couple of impact spells from Thakray, we have little or no go-forward in our front row whatsoever and most SL packs will dominate us as they did last season.
Agreed. And this really worries me TBH.
thehullwhitestar wrote:We have released two scrum halves and replaced them with a stand off(not a bad one) and we could quite possibly see, for the third consecutive season, Tommy Lee in our halfbalks which is a complete joke.
Neither released SH was the answer, though. And nobody else of any class was available. I'm no fan of Thorman but if he just brings some organisation, communication, and a kicking game to the party we'll be better off than most of last season.
thehullwhitestar wrote:In Briscoe and Hall we have two young and inexperienced centres who would make good back-up centres/wingers to a class centre which we desperately need.
Kind of agree, but I think that Hall could actually go well for us if given a chance and played correctly.
thehullwhitestar wrote:In Byrne, Cusack, Radford, Lee and, to a lesser extent, some others, we have a hell of a lot of salary cap wasted on players who would just not get a look in at any other top 8 SL squads.
Yup. Although Cusack would be OK if we had better/more impact props.
thehullwhitestar wrote:I don't think that I'm being even remotely hasty, just realistic. We have an overall mid-table squad and that will almost certainly be reflected in the SL table for 2009.
Pretty much how I see it also.