Wellsy13 wrote::lol:
I've heard it all now! Was 7th placed Rovers too good for Australian test player Crocker then?
Come on. If you're going to lie, at least make it credible! No-one in SL would turn down Michael Crocker.
So by that reckoning all 12 teams wanted him.
When in reality the only other club he spoke to was Quins.
Why can you not just accept that his position is covered and covered well at Rovers.
I have stated several creditable reasons as to why Morgan would not sign him but because he has ended up at the KC you overlook them and look to score childish points instead.
Lets not forget that at the moment he is unproven in SL and before you scoff many players have struggled over here who have Aussie caps to their name the latest being Matt King.
Then there is his disciplinary record which is poor, suspended for 21 weeks since 2001, and the injuries which have been mentioned.
If he goes well and leads Hull up the table then fair do's.
Im more then happy with our second row pairing and so is Justin Morgan.
His off season recruitment has strengthened the areas that needed it.
No Second Row was signed.
That is proof enough as far as im concerned.
It's a fact we could of had Crocker, he is best mates with Newton._zps67e534e4.jpg)
