Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
We're obsessed?
This from a man who has now made pretty much THE self same post, changing the odd word here and there, but saying pretty much the same thing, since the early Middle Ages?
Well, you should know about obsession, that's for sure!
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
Joined: Feb 09 2005 Posts: 3859 Location: Manchester
Beechwood Bull wrote:Sorry, I couldn't read it.
And tiny print still isn't irony.
Who said it was ironic? It was a deliverate attempt at trolling which seems to have worked.
The fact that you could see a very small piece of something there would indicate that you either couldn't be bothered to attempt to read it and would therefore try to be clever or you didn't know how (by either using your operating systems magnifier tool or enlarging your browsers font size).
Either way, it was a deliberate windup and trolling attempt. Some of my points were my opinions, some weren't. Move along..
Paul124897 wrote:Who said it was ironic? It was a deliverate attempt at trolling which seems to have worked.
The fact that you could see a very small piece of something there would indicate that you either couldn't be bothered to attempt to read it and would therefore try to be clever or you didn't know how (by either using your operating systems magnifier tool or enlarging your browsers font size).
Either way, it was a deliberate windup and trolling attempt. Some of my points were my opinions, some weren't. Move along..
Joined: Feb 12 2006 Posts: 15035 Location: Gods County
Paul124897 wrote:Who said it was ironic? It was a deliverate attempt at trolling which seems to have worked.
The fact that you could see a very small piece of something there would indicate that you either couldn't be bothered to attempt to read it and would therefore try to be clever or you didn't know how (by either using your operating systems magnifier tool or enlarging your browsers font size).
Either way, it was a deliberate windup and trolling attempt. Some of my points were my opinions, some weren't. Move along..
You've caught a whopper.
I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying.
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 10445 Location: Bradford
mystic eddie wrote:TBH I am puzzled as to why the likes of you and your fellow club parrot (and anagram of you) FA are so obsessed. OK, I was prepared to cut the coach a bit of slack but the bigger picture just does not lead to believe that he is anything else but incapable of coaching our side competently. By all means copy this out toname and shame me at the fans forum (you too Mr Duffy) because there is no reason to suggest that we are going anywhere else but backwards under Steve McNamara.
His 2009 recruitment is questionable TBH and I just have no confidence in him whatsoever. As I have been saying for a while now, he will soon prove me 100% correct.
Whoah there, no obsession and no attack intended. I thought the Agatha Christie reference would have underlined the intended jocualrity. Just genuinely interested what happened to make you sympathise with SM for a short while there.
As for the parrot jibe, I've never heard Hood or Duffy compare McNamara to Clement Attlee (or Barack Obama ). By the way, do you think Attlee was crap? Or do the circumstances in which he became PM have to be taken into account? Just you've never said...
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
). By the way, do you think Attlee was crap? Or do the circumstances in which he became PM have to be taken into account? Just you've never said...
