Post subject: DISGUSTEDPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:27 pm
Live Wired
Cheeky half-back
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:36 pm Posts: 579 Live Wired
Cheeky half-back
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:36 pm Posts: 578 I honestly thought I would never see the day, that I thought rugby league would be ranked as low as professional darts,American wrestling and some bloke on itv wrestling having his mask ripped off-when unconscious, would stoop so low, as to attract a tv audience.
Tonight, I saw it. Now I admit to having a betting interest on Crusaders to win the game, but the descion(sic) of the ref/video ref to allow the Saints try, brought the game into disrepute-big time. Why don't we just admit that SKY dictate. Quite convenient that the race for 2nd/3rd goes to the final game of the season.
words fail me, if you want proof of sky-dominated games, just have a look through the shocking ref/video ref descions (sic) that have occured over the past few years on live games.
Ultimately, this could cost Crusaders a top-8 place and a cash windfall.
Joined: Aug 29 2006 Posts: 1859 Location: Chorley Panthers
Obsessed
King piemon wrote - What a pile of $hit
It was cack the whole team and i for one aint impressed
AJ wrote - Sean Long once again tore us to pieces. Its all well and good us singing Sean Long is a W@nker, but he was laughing back along by conducting the chant whilst ripping us to bits.
Robinson wrote - Saints - it depends on whether the side can get over their mental block. We're more than capable of beating 'Dads Army', but it appears that Wigan still shiit themselves at the mere sight of a red V.
I have to agree. It certainly looks that way. It's not like saints needed the refs help, which is why i can't understand why the decisions were so against us
Joined: Jul 22 2008 Posts: 16170 Location: Somewhere other than here
Spongolium wrote:I have to agree. It certainly looks that way. It's not like saints needed the refs help, which is why i can't understand why the decisions were so against us
They weren't. We were dinged left, right and centre for penalties, because we deserved to be. But that 'try' by James Roby was not a try even though his efforts probably deserved one. Me and those I was sitting with were all saying what a damned shame that it was short and were totally shocked when Smith awarded it. I still can't figure out how he called that as a try even now that I've watched the match back! But as for penalties ... I'm sure you were awarded more than we were. It certainly felt like that!
Either way, the final score flattered us and you didn't deserve to lose by that number. Based on your first half performance, you didn't deserve to lose, period.
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. (Winston Churchill)
Joined: Jul 22 2008 Posts: 16170 Location: Somewhere other than here
dede wrote:Did enyone see what happened to K.C. Its been implied it was an elbow but by who, and is it one for the disipplinary
It was reported as being a stray elbow but whether there was any malice is unknown. If there was then it will be picked up by the RFL when they do their weekly review. I doubt anything is being done about it by anyone else.
Confirmed on Saints website this morning that KC does not have a fracture or break to the jaw so he is probably just bruised.
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. (Winston Churchill)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 85 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
