Post subject: Re: Still in the hands of the Administrator?
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 12:19 pm
Traffic
Player Coach
Joined: Mar 22 2009 Posts: 1200 Location: South Wales
DemonUK wrote:Noticed on the Red Passion MB (Wrexham FC) that the club is still in the hands of the administrator ie Roberts and Moss haven't as of 16th December, completed the purchase despite promises that it was all sorted and would be completed over a week ago. I also noticed that Mr Roberts is not held in very high regard around Wrexham.
DemonUK wrote:Noticed on the Red Passion MB (Wrexham FC) that the club is still in the hands of the administrator ie Roberts and Moss haven't as of 16th December, completed the purchase despite promises that it was all sorted and would be completed over a week ago. I also noticed that Mr Roberts is not held in very high regard around Wrexham.
Post subject: Re: Still in the hands of the Administrator?
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:51 pm
kinleycat
Player Coach
Joined: Feb 07 2009 Posts: 9974 Location: In the shed aerating my wort!!!
Brasshat, as a supporter of a flat cap club I weren't having a dig at them!! I was merely pointing out it's not just flatcappers that don't like you, it's supporters of your "current" landlords. Apologies, as I keep pointing out to your clubs supporters, but your club makes a mockery of this league, a dig? You bet!!! You my friend are clueless, but then again on this almost desolate forum?? What else!!! No doubt empty forum such as this indicate success to the RFL!!!! Like empty grounds, no grounds, no money, bankrupcey, playing illegal players, playing more foreign players than your oppononents, being bankrolled, not being held account to your debts........... you lot just don't get it, your a toy, your not serious, give it a rest, it's embarrasing!!!!!!
READ THE AUP: //forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=438945&tsmp=1381997916
Post subject: Re: Still in the hands of the Administrator?
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 7:32 pm
Him
International Chairman
Joined: Jun 19 2002 Posts: 14970 Location: Campaigning for a deep attacking line
kinleycat wrote:Like empty grounds, no grounds, no money, bankrupcey, playing illegal players, playing more foreign players than your oppononents, being bankrolled, not being held account to your debts........... you lot just don't get it, your a toy, your not serious, give it a rest, it's embarrasing!!!!!!
You didn't! Tell me you didn't just do that! You, a Wakefield fan, didn't seriously seriously just try and take the p1ss out of another club for: - having an empty ground - having no ground - having no money - playing foreign players - being bankrolled and having debts!
Crusaders have a stadium to play in in the future, have never gone bankrupt, have never cancelled several players contracts and have much more potential than the current hole Wakefield are in. All this without the benefit of 100 years of heritage and history in which to build up a brand, something that Wakefield have massively failed to do even in their own town.
Post subject: Re: Still in the hands of the Administrator?
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:20 pm
kinleycat
Player Coach
Joined: Feb 07 2009 Posts: 9974 Location: In the shed aerating my wort!!!
In answer 1) only have an empty ground when crusaders, quins and catalans come! Our average gate is around 7k (which should be better!!) in a ground that holds 10k, 70% occupancy, +30% more than SL franchise rules. 2) We have a ground for this season, obviously our hopes for 2012 have hit the buffers however we have an agreement to play at "a" ground that meets SL standards for 3 years. 3) we have the amount of money we have, end of, we employ players and staff we can afford, we don't need £700k of RFL employees to keep us going (god we could do with it!!) 4) we have to stay within RFL guidelines, crusaders have their own, and have not been punished for their "illegal aliens" 5) if only we could be bankrolled by the RFL or anyone!!!! 6) the debts re HMRC are regarding image rights, this will affect all clubs, to a greater or lesser extent. We were picked first as one of the weeker clubs, they wouldn't of tried it with Leeds, Wigan, Saints etc. The only reason crusaders are in SL is because it is the wish of SL, if it was down to a level playing field they would never have made SL, if it was down to fair play and a promotion and relegation system, they wouldn't have lasted, FACT!!!! Rant over.
READ THE AUP: //forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=438945&tsmp=1381997916
Post subject: Re: Still in the hands of the Administrator?
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:52 am
boost
Player Coach
Joined: Mar 22 2008 Posts: 631 Location: Wales
kinleycat wrote: 1) only have an empty ground when crusaders, quins and catalans come! Our average gate is around 7k (which should be better!!) in a ground that holds 10k, 70% occupancy, +30% more than SL franchise rules. even your team didn't manage to turn up in time for the kick off at Wrexham, our team had fallen asleep hours before your team showed up. 2) We have a ground for this season, obviously our hopes for 2012 have hit the buffers however we have an agreement to play at "a" ground that meets SL standards for 3 years. your ground was built long before the arrival of the Celtic Crusaders in Bridgend, so you can't land that one on us 3) we have the amount of money we have, end of, we employ players and staff we can afford, we don't need £700k of RFL employees to keep us going (god we could do with it!!) make up your mind, you " don't need it but could do with it"? 4) we have to stay within RFL guidelines, crusaders have their own, and have not been punished for their "illegal aliens" fine for one player only 5) if only we could be bankrolled by the RFL or anyone!!!! in 3) you suggested you didn't need or want any help from the RFL 6) the debts re HMRC are regarding image rights, this will affect all clubs, to a greater or lesser extent. We were picked first as one of the weeker clubs, they wouldn't of tried it with Leeds, Wigan, Saints etc. maybe The only reason crusaders are in SL is because it is the wish of SL, if it was down to a level playing field they would never have made SL, if it was down to fair play and a promotion and relegation system, they wouldn't have lasted, FACT!!!! or your "educated guess" Rant over.
Post subject: Re: Still in the hands of the Administrator?
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:55 pm
Brasshat
Player Coach
Joined: Feb 02 2010 Posts: 96 Location: Wrexham
kinleycat wrote:Brasshat, as a supporter of a flat cap club I weren't having a dig at them!! I was merely pointing out it's not just flatcappers that don't like you, it's supporters of your "current" landlords. Apologies, as I keep pointing out to your clubs supporters, but your club makes a mockery of this league, a dig? You bet!!! You my friend are clueless, but then again on this almost desolate forum?? What else!!! No doubt empty forum such as this indicate success to the RFL!!!! Like empty grounds, no grounds, no money, bankrupcey, playing illegal players, playing more foreign players than your oppononents, being bankrolled, not being held account to your debts........... you lot just don't get it, your a toy, your not serious, give it a rest, it's embarrasing!!!!!!
Make up your mind, either you are having a dig or not.
You are scraping the barrel if you are trying to make something out of a few soccer fans, who are not happy with their team's performance and take it out on their owners. The only embarrassing thing is your obsession. Get a grip man.
Oh, seasons greetings and goodwill to all man kind etc.
Post subject: Re: Still in the hands of the Administrator?
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:02 pm
chissitt
Player Coach
Joined: Oct 07 2007 Posts: 11589
BigRob wrote:You didn't! Tell me you didn't just do that! You, a Wakefield fan, didn't seriously seriously just try and take the p1ss out of another club for: - having an empty ground - having no ground - having no money - playing foreign players - being bankrolled and having debts!
You've missed out the toilet without a lightbulb
Crusaders have a stadium to play in in the future, have never gone bankrupt, have never cancelled several players contracts and have much more potential than the current hole Wakefield are in. All this without the benefit of 100 years of heritage and history in which to build up a brand, something that Wakefield have massively failed to do even in their own town.
137 years actually, but don't let that stop you from making things up as you go along like all the rest of your cr@p on here
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 229 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum