Hedgehog King wrote:Agreeing to pay the Crusaders' wages for November. Not to forget that Crusaders are being allowed to sign players whilst Batley are not.
The RFL aren't paying crusaders players wages you idiot, They have just given them the money the RFL owe Crusaders from TV revenue a month early etc.
captain blackbeard wrote:I don't know how you Crusaders fans put up with these 'retards' mostly from Yorkshire. They really are becoming very tedious with the 'Barrow and Batley should be in Super League' CRAP! Why should Blackpool be in exactly? In fact, don't answer!
Harlequins,Crusaders and Catalans. You're all doing a good job so please don't let the same old goats dribble affect your judgment on what the average fan thinks. Well from Warrington anyway. None of the teams who the moaners would like in your place should be allowed any where the Super League. After hundreds of years of existence there is simply no desire in there local areas for a rugby team. SIMPLE AS THAT
There's nothing like RL Fans ability to take 2, add another imaginary 2, come up with 76 as an answer and then offer it as evidence of some RLF conspiracy.
and tb as an above average intelligence poster you should know in your head if not your heart statisticst/numbers are a load of bull where the rfl are involved anyway
Crufan94 wrote:The RFL aren't paying crusaders players wages you idiot, They have just given them the money the RFL owe Crusaders from TV revenue a month early etc.
Good plan can I have the money I'm owed a month early... its nearly Christmas and I do have presents to buy.
Joined: Mar 24 2010 Posts: 148 Location: In a big field
Crufan94 wrote:Blackpool could not come up with viable financial plans for the future. Crusaders could. Ergo sadly Blackpool got kicked out while Crusaders remain Hopefully The pamnthers can find a new financial backer and be reinstated back to the leagues
Is this the same plan they used when they moved to Wrexham.
Crufan94 wrote:The RFL aren't paying crusaders players wages you idiot, They have just given them the money the RFL owe Crusaders from TV revenue a month early etc.
I'm no idiot fellow, I have a degree in Economics. I understand what "book value", "net present value" and "internal rate of return" mean but I doubt you do. Advancing money ahead of when it is earned is effectively giving money away. It is generally called "a loan" for which interest payments are usually expected.
If it is a loan it is not 'giving money away' , anyway as far as we know the RFL is advancing money to the club from Sky as each club will get at some point. The way the situation with the Crusaders differs from Blackpool and Batley is that the two don't have the potential to pay back such sums of money through normal expected trading, I would have thought this might have some baring on the club coming to an agreement with the RFL and HMRC about transfer embargo/administration as Batley and Blackpool unfortunately cannot given their relative economic value. I may be wrong , I wait to see and hear what the RFL and the club has to say next week. The RFL need to give a definitive answer on where we all stand quickly.
The club has been crippled by the debt accrued by Samuel and the previous club in Bridgend, in Wrexham the club seems to have faired well in its first year. It shouldnt be paying for someone elses mistakes.
The players signed by the Crusaders were also signed before the club went into administration , they have not signed anyone since.
Last edited by cardiffcrusaderrob on Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
