WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
Steve Ganson https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=522959 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | pugwash pal [ Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Steve Ganson |
In todays game he got most things right, in fact I could only fault the held call which was too quick in the first half but he did call held when we pushed the player over the line, a real change to other weeks. The worry for Rovers is the amount of pen,s we give away each game and that has done us out of 3 games this year, cut the pen's and have Ganson for the Derby, jobs a gud un. ![]() |
Author: | bishops finger [ Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Steve Ganson |
I thought he was ok today. We didn't get much from him mind. |
Author: | Paul T - HKR [ Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Steve Ganson |
I thought Ganson tried his hardest to keep Hudds in the game in the 2nd half - I was baffled by 4 of the 5 penalties he awarded them? Will check the replay on HKRTV. Oh, and the least said about the forward pass the better! |
Author: | Red & White [ Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Steve Ganson |
Paul T - HKR wrote:I thought Ganson tried his hardest to keep Hudds in the game in the 2nd half - I was baffled by 4 of the 5 penalties he awarded them? Will check the replay on HKRTV. Oh, and the least said about the forward pass the better! me too |
Author: | rover49 [ Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Steve Ganson |
It will be interesting to see the replay, but he seemed to be quick to give them relieving penalties as we were threatening their line, on a few occasions you could predict them. |
Author: | Anakin Skywalker [ Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Steve Ganson |
Paul T - HKR wrote:I thought Ganson tried his hardest to keep Hudds in the game in the 2nd half - I was baffled by 4 of the 5 penalties he awarded them? Will check the replay on HKRTV. Oh, and the least said about the forward pass the better! Would the comments about forward passes you are missing include the clear one by Mika for the Latus try? |
Author: | Paul T - HKR [ Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Steve Ganson |
Anakin Skywalker wrote:Would the comments about forward passes you are missing include the clear one by Mika for the Latus try? I don't see how a behind-the-back pass could be classed as a forward pass but hey ho! I thought it was a brilliant pass ![]() |
Author: | Anakin Skywalker [ Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Steve Ganson |
Paul T - HKR wrote:I don't see how a behind-the-back pass could be classed as a forward pass but hey ho! I thought it was a brilliant pass ![]() It was so much an out the back as it was out the side IMHO. It then seemed to propel forward hit another player before bouncing backward before Latus picked it up. |
Author: | FLAG EDGE TOUCH [ Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Steve Ganson |
Bonesy nailed him at the end...he didn't manage to get away with a 'Sports Relief' ball !!! |
Author: | interchange [ Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Steve Ganson |
Anakin Skywalker wrote:It was so much an out the back as it was out the side IMHO. It then seemed to propel forward hit another player before bouncing backward before Latus picked it up. The only obligation the player has is that the ball has to leave his hands not forwards, what happens regarding direction after that is irrelevant according to the laws of the game. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |