WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
vs Saints https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=519489 |
Page 1 of 7 |
Author: | Wildmoose [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | vs Saints |
Watts into the 19, no Carlisle ![]() McDonnell, Hall, D. Hodgson, Clinton, Withers, Webster, Watts, Wheeldon, Taylor, Lovegrove, J. Hodgson, Paea, Horne, Murrell, Mika, Netherton, Cox, Welham, Latus. Wellens, Gardner, Shenton, Soliola, Meli, Hohaia, Lomax, Perry, Roby, McCarthy-Scarsbrook, Puletua, Wilkin, Flannery, Laffranchi, Clough, Wheeler, Dixon, Makinson, Foster. |
Author: | Sandro II Terrorista [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: vs Saints |
Could be a long afternoon. You'd think we'll probably adopt a defensive game plan, which I think would be a mistake. Could be a game for Netherton's defensive qualities. |
Author: | Willa [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: vs Saints |
Damn!!!! Forgot to take Welham out of my sldreamteam team. Think he could achieve a superleague most missed tackles record this week |
Author: | Paul T - HKR [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: vs Saints |
When Justin announced his 19 you could quite easily select the team from it, but not with Sandercock, he has more permutations than a Lucky-15! I reckon Netherton and Latus will miss out but my two would be Netherton and Murrell. I would select Latus on the wing thus bringing an end to the switch around between Hall and Lovegrove. I notice Gaskell is missing for Saints and Roby is doubtful (but I expect him to play irrespective of Simmon's 100% fit pledge). |
Author: | stew [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: vs Saints |
surely no Carlile means Murrell and Hall will be in the halves and not Withers. |
Author: | Sandro II Terrorista [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: vs Saints |
stew wrote:surely no Carlile means Murrell and Hall will be in the halves and not Withers. AAARRRGGHHHH!!!! ![]() |
Author: | fun time frankie [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: vs Saints |
stew wrote:surely no Carlile means Murrell and Hall will be in the halves and not Withers. unless murrells playing hooker we can live in hope |
Author: | Saint from Prestwich [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: vs Saints |
what you lot worried about?You always beat us at your place |
Author: | fun time frankie [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: vs Saints |
Saint from Prestwich wrote:what you lot worried about?You always beat us at your place i think that run may just come to an end without green dobson galea |
Author: | Wildmoose [ Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: vs Saints |
Was sure Carlisle would be in. Guessing Nev & Watts on the bench with maybe Cox getting a rest? |
Page 1 of 7 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |