WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

lovegrove
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=518654		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Jake the Peg [ Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:38 pm ]
Post subject:  lovegrove
Just been looking at stats on the superleague site and seen lovegrove was top tackler in round 1 with 58, but he only carried the ball 6 times. Wonder if this is tactical and your new coach wants a 13 to do plenty of tackling so doesn't use him much in attack to conserve energy?
Author:  ☺East-Sard☺ [ Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: lovegrove
Jake the Peg wrote:Just been looking at stats on the superleague site and seen lovegrove was top tackler in round 1 with 58, but he only carried the ball 6 times. Wonder if this is tactical and your new coach wants a 13 to do plenty of tackling so doesn't use him much in attack to conserve energy?


See switch malarkey thread

In short, Lovegrove and Hall are switching positions every defensive/offensive set
Jake the Peg wrote:Just been looking at stats on the superleague site and seen lovegrove was top tackler in round 1 with 58, but he only carried the ball 6 times. Wonder if this is tactical and your new coach wants a 13 to do plenty of tackling so doesn't use him much in attack to conserve energy?


See switch malarkey thread

In short, Lovegrove and Hall are switching positions every defensive/offensive set
Author:  bishops finger [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: lovegrove
58 tackles is unbelievable, that'll take some beating I reckon.
Author:  Dudley [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: lovegrove
And he still only got a 5 in Charlie mullens player ratings!
Author:  Sheldon [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: lovegrove
So Lovegroves defending at 13 and attacking at 2 and Halls 2 and 6.

Does that mean Murrell is 6 and 13?
Author:  Sandro II Terrorista [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: lovegrove
Sheldon wrote:So Lovegroves defending at 13 and attacking at 2 and Halls 2 and 6.

Does that mean Murrell is 6 and 13?


God knows, it was like a big game of run around at times.
Author:  bishops finger [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: lovegrove
Sheldon wrote:So Lovegroves defending at 13 and attacking at 2 and Halls 2 and 6.

Does that mean Murrell is 6 and 13?


Yes basically its Hall and Lovegrove swapping between attack and defence, with Murrell at looseman.
Lovegrove's pretty quick and a big unit so could do well from 10 yards out.
Author:  fun time frankie [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: lovegrove
Sandra The Terrorist wrote:God knows, it was like a big game of run around at times.

loved runaround :D
Author:  Sandro II Terrorista [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: lovegrove
fun time frankie wrote:loved runaround :D


fx>Cockney mode "ON":


RUNARAAAAND NAAAAAAAAAA!

Image


Cockney mode "OFF"<fx
Author:  fun time frankie [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: lovegrove
Sandra The Terrorist wrote:fx>Cockney mode "ON":


RUNARAAAAND NAAAAAAAAAA!

Image


Cockney mode "OFF"<fx

Mike Reid RIP his finest hour
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/