WWW.RLFANS.COM :: View topic

EL CAMO wrote:After weeks of defending Morgan I finally believe that it's time to go.
His favouritism has become too extreme. When you think back it has always been around, right back to the days of Dwayne Barker. Now with his persistence with people who are clearly way out of form he is damaging the team.
I'm not part of the "Matt Cook is the messiah" group but refusing to play him tonight when it was perfect for him to play he was yet again left in the stands. Constantly leaving the likes of Cook and Hall out is not only damaging their careers but also the chances that they'll do a job for us.
I appreciate what Morgs has done and I'd be the first to shake his hand and thank him for all he has done for rovers but it's time to go.
All good things come to an end and I think now is the right time.

barton baird wrote:Out of interest,why did he sign Hall just to have him sidelined?

bigcjlchris wrote:Upon morgan signing hally he told him he would not play him in other positions unlike agar did,but when foxxy goes who knows he does well at winger aswell with pace to spare..

Beverley red wrote:I thought Hall had picked up an injury in training (reported on local BBC) or he would have played. I still dont see what Cook has done to be left out would get in in place of Vella for me.

EL CAMO wrote:Hall played for the twenties. FWIW I'd have gone with 1. Welham 2. Fox 3. Hall 4. Webster 5. Latus.

barham red wrote:If he had the cries of derision at not playing Sheriff, moving our best centre etc would have been deafening.

Author:	EL CAMO [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Favouritism
After weeks of defending Morgan I finally believe that it's time to go. His favouritism has become too extreme. When you think back it has always been around, right back to the days of Dwayne Barker. Now with his persistence with people who are clearly way out of form he is damaging the team. I'm not part of the "Matt Cook is the messiah" group but refusing to play him tonight when it was perfect for him to play he was yet again left in the stands. Constantly leaving the likes of Cook and Hall out is not only damaging their careers but also the chances that they'll do a job for us. I appreciate what Morgs has done and I'd be the first to shake his hand and thank him for all he has done for rovers but it's time to go. All good things come to an end and I think now is the right time.

Author:	craigsmith94 [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Favouritism
sounds like morgan prefer the auzzies over english player, the english players seem to put miles more effort in the the aussies like newton who morgans seems to prefer even though hes been crap all season , i think cook shud play as he puts more passion in then the likes of newton nd the other aussies

Author:	barton baird [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Favouritism
EL CAMO wrote:After weeks of defending Morgan I finally believe that it's time to go. His favouritism has become too extreme. When you think back it has always been around, right back to the days of Dwayne Barker. Now with his persistence with people who are clearly way out of form he is damaging the team. I'm not part of the "Matt Cook is the messiah" group but refusing to play him tonight when it was perfect for him to play he was yet again left in the stands. Constantly leaving the likes of Cook and Hall out is not only damaging their careers but also the chances that they'll do a job for us. I appreciate what Morgs has done and I'd be the first to shake his hand and thank him for all he has done for rovers but it's time to go. All good things come to an end and I think now is the right time. Out of interest,why did he sign Hall just to have him sidelined?

Author:	EL CAMO [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:23 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Favouritism
barton baird wrote:Out of interest,why did he sign Hall just to have him sidelined? The story goes that Hall came as back cover but told Morgan he didn't want to be utility, he wanted to nail down a centre spot. Poor choice as we have two very good centres at the club.

Author:	craigsmith94 [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:24 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Favouritism
Out of interest,why did he sign Hall just to have him sidelined? i think hall was more of hudgells signing tbh

WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/

Favouritism https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=503090	Page 1 of 2

Author:	bigcjlchris [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:00 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Favouritism
Upon morgan signing hally he told him he would not play him in other positions unlike agar did,but when foxxy goes who knows he does well at winger aswell with pace to spare..

Author:	Beverley red [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:58 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Favouritism
bigcjlchris wrote:Upon morgan signing hally he told him he would not play him in other positions unlike agar did,but when foxxy goes who knows he does well at winger aswell with pace to spare.. I thought Hall had picked up an injury in training (reported on local BBC) or he would have played. I still dont see what Cook has done to be left out would get in in place of Vella for me.

Author:	EL CAMO [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Favouritism
Beverley red wrote:I thought Hall had picked up an injury in training (reported on local BBC) or he would have played. I still dont see what Cook has done to be left out would get in in place of Vella for me. Hall played for the twenties. FWIW I'd have gone with 1. Welham 2. Fox 3. Hall 4. Webster 5. Latus.

Author:	barham red [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:03 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Favouritism
EL CAMO wrote:Hall played for the twenties. FWIW I'd have gone with 1. Welham 2. Fox 3. Hall 4. Webster 5. Latus. If he had the cries of derision at not playing Sheriff, moving our best centre etc would have been deafening.

Author:	EL CAMO [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:23 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Favouritism
barham red wrote:If he had the cries of derision at not playing Sheriff, moving our best centre etc would have been deafening. But for the good of the team that would have been the best option. Sheriff was not ready to be thrown in in such a big game and Welham would have been solid.

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/