WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
SCOTT MURRELL https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=498219 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | suttonrobin [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:08 am ] |
Post subject: | SCOTT MURRELL |
The guy is a joke, waddles around like a gazelle with a belly full of babies. Ive seen amateurs in better shape. Granted his defence is solid but the guy offers very little else otherwise. The guy needs an intensive fitness regime, because beer bellies are not en vougue in super league. |
Author: | gingerspice [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: SCOTT MURRELL |
suttonrobin wrote:The guy is a joke, waddles around like a gazelle with a belly full of babies. Ive seen amateurs in better shape. Granted his defence is solid but the guy offers very little else otherwise. The guy needs an intensive fitness regime, because beer bellies are not en vougue in super league. I think scotty has certainly let him self go in that dept surely the conditioner should be taking a look and saying hang on but uve put on way to much weight, he is slow offers nothing in attack granted tackling is great, maybe we should get him fed up like solomana and use him as a battering ram ![]() |
Author: | suttonrobin [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: SCOTT MURRELL |
gingerspice wrote:I think scotty has certainly let him self go in that dept surely the conditioner should be taking a look and saying hang on but uve put on way to much weight, he is slow offers nothing in attack granted tackling is great, maybe we should get him fed up like solomana and use him as a battering ram ![]() Ah yeah, forgot about Solomona, but comparing him to Murrell is wrong as Solomona has been that size since he started at Parramatta 12 years ago. |
Author: | gingerspice [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: SCOTT MURRELL |
suttonrobin wrote:Ah yeah, forgot about Solomona, but comparing him to Murrell is wrong as Solomona has been that size since he started at Parramatta 12 years ago. But hes heading that way ![]() |
Author: | gingerspice [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: SCOTT MURRELL |
suttonrobin wrote:Ah yeah, forgot about Solomona, but comparing him to Murrell is wrong as Solomona has been that size since he started at Parramatta 12 years ago. And semolina really trimmed down wen he first went to wire so it can be done it's just an excuse to get that big or it's a tactical plan by Tony smith. |
Author: | barham red [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: SCOTT MURRELL |
I don't think Murrell is fat as such, if you look at his shape he seemes to have done weights work but it only seems to have gone on his chest and made him very top heavy. He hasn't got a gut, his shape is very like a stunted Carvell, which for a prop is a great shape, for a supposed ball playing loose is not great, his mobility has suffered as such and hard hitting tackles aside he has become ineffective. |
Author: | Gordon Gekko [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: SCOTT MURRELL |
barham red wrote:I don't think Murrell is fat as such, if you look at his shape he seemes to have done weights work but it only seems to have gone on his chest and made him very top heavy. He hasn't got a gut, his shape is very like a stunted Carvell, which for a prop is a great shape, for a supposed ball playing loose is not great, his mobility has suffered as such and hard hitting tackles aside he has become ineffective. Think you'll find Murrell wears chest protection, hence his seemingly large upper body and agree he isn't fat at all. Doubtless the people who think this are those who shout 'forward' all the time ![]() |
Author: | Captain Dave [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: SCOTT MURRELL |
Gordon Gekko wrote:Think you'll find Murrell wears chest protection, hence his seemingly large upper body and agree he isn't fat at all. Doubtless the people who think this are those who shout 'forward' all the time ![]() That's not me then , I shout 'knock on' too ![]() |
Author: | barham red [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: SCOTT MURRELL |
Gordon Gekko wrote:Think you'll find Murrell wears chest protection, hence his seemingly large upper body and agree he isn't fat at all. Doubtless the people who think this are those who shout 'forward' all the time ![]() Someone needs to tell him suits of armour went out of vogue in the 1600's, at least we know why he's slowed up so much tho'.. |
Author: | Gordon Gekko [ Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: SCOTT MURRELL |
barham red wrote:Someone needs to tell him suits of armour went out of vogue in the 1600's, at least we know why he's slowed up so much tho'.. Best tell Clint as well, its not good for his image to be so unfashionable ![]() ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |