HKR Smithy wrote:And the obvious question how did Mason go?
Not been,but mostly forward I would imagine.
| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| Rovers 40-22 Crusaders https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=486264 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | HKR Smithy [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
Couldnt get to the game as i was working, thoughts on the game folks? And the obvious question how did Mason go? |
|
| Author: | barton baird [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
HKR Smithy wrote:And the obvious question how did Mason go? Not been,but mostly forward I would imagine.
|
|
| Author: | Beverley red [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
first spell he terrorised the crusaders & the rest of the team lifted thier game Watts was nearly as good, It all went a bit flat after he left the field. his second spell was not as good but he needs game time & to learn the moves to build up understanding with others. His ball handling was good in places & will realy add to the team. Fox was a bit more solid & is gaining some confidence, Hall loked good to me as it is the first time ive seen him play for us. There is still a lot of scope for improvement & a better side could have hurt us. One highlight was Richard Moore chasing down Hall & tackling him into touch. He would be a good English signing if he ever becomes available. |
|
| Author: | cab man [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
GREAT BASKETBALL OFFLOADS FROM THE BIG MAN MEANT A DECENT FIRST HALF. DOING OKAY THEN CLINT (i will carry this team) NEWTON WENT OFF AND IT WAS WELSH TSUNAMI TIME. THANK GOD FOR WELHAMS INTERCEPT OR IT COULD OF GOT EMBARESSING. STILL LOTS TO DO WITH THIS TEAM BUT AT LEAST THE BIG MAN CAME THROUGH UNSCATHED. |
|
| Author: | Scott_HKR [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
I thought Mason showed he is here to play though. Looked the part early on, and when match fitness is up to scratch, I'm sure we'll see the best from big willie |
|
| Author: | Traffic [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
Thought your new signing went well, think his name was R Hicks? 
|
|
| Author: | EL CAMO [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
Traffic wrote:Thought your new signing went well, think his name was R Hicks?  Honestly, you thought he favoured us?! |
|
| Author: | GraftonRed [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
Traffic wrote:Thought your new signing went well, think his name was R Hicks?   
|
|
| Author: | blakeysrobin [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
Traffic wrote:Thought your new signing went well, think his name was R Hicks? Thought he went okay to be honest. Tried to let things go until it got a little untidy. 50 pens today if childs had reffed. |
|
| Author: | HKR Smithy [ Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rovers 40-22 Crusaders |
barton baird wrote:Not been,but mostly forward I would imagine. very witty response well done....  only kidding mate by the sounds of it he did go forward quite a lot and played well which is very encouraging considering its his first game Glad to hear Fox improved and that the half back combo came together a bit better  Obviously we have a fair bit of improving to do but its a win after 3 straight losses so something to build on now and take into the game against Salford
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|