very red robin wrote:What peoples thoughts on tonights game?

imo Hull should of done alot better in the last 20 minutes against a side with 1 sub.
Seemed they lacked invention and poor kicking put them in bad positions for the defensive line.

Quote:A 14-man Leeds team without Peacock, Cross, Bailey, Lauititi, McGuire and then Webb, Ablett and Delaney

dum-dum wrote:Should have capitalised IMO, They did right by not starting the game all guns blazing but that's where doing right ended.

very red robin wrote:Disagree, i think they should of gone all out once again, 14-0 up at the KC most teams wouldnt of got back into it.
Now if they went all out and didnt put points on the board quick - 50 niller.

The fact isnt they didnt come out blazing - and leeds scored within 2minutes, so IMO wrong idea.

dum-dum wrote:They wouldn't have gone 14 up against that starting Leeds team. Webb, Ablett and Delaney might not have gotten injured and Hull would have been loved and like you say - 50 niller. That start against us was a freak due to the Derby emotions IMO and we won't see anything like that from them again this season, maybe April.

very red robin wrote:But they came out too lazy which gave Leeds a lead within 90 seconds, I no id rather see KR come out strongly then not at all.

dum-dum wrote:They looked battered and bruised just walking out of the tunnel, Was Fitzy's shiner courtesy of our own Mr Murrell?

In those first few minutes, as the ticker came across the bottom showing the Salford v Saints score, I thought Leeds were going to match Saints point for point, Leeds weren't the best last week and so nobody really knew how they would play tonight, They had pressure on them to come and perform too, They realised within 90 seconds that if you go down the middle, Fitzy tackles you, if you go out wide you get a try.