As for Wakefield I am truly gutted. I hope they are saved and do not have to drop out of SL to keep a crap team from London or Wales in.
FFS and people wonder why some trolls love this board
| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| Wakefield https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=480036 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | rednwhite [ Thu Jan 20, 2011 7:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Wakefield |
it doesnt seem too good for them, my hearts goes out to them and the wildcats fans, hope the monkeys at the rfl will do something to help. |
|
| Author: | hkrdavidhkr [ Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wakefield |
they won`t do jack at the rfl, wakey is not in one of the expansion ares so will be allowed to go to the wall like other clubs have, plus they want the franchise spot, and this will make the decision easier on them |
|
| Author: | Sandro II Terrorista [ Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:53 pm ] | ||||
| Post subject: | Re: Wakefield | ||||
|
|||||
| Author: | the artist [ Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wakefield |
agree with you, as always its the loyal fans saving up all week/year for a ticket that get hit the hardest by all this, whilst those guilty often leave with an enhanced bank balance to exhibit their incompetence in another area |
|
| Author: | Bertie [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wakefield |
hkrdavidhkr wrote:they won`t do jack at the rfl, wakey is not in one of the expansion ares so will be allowed to go to the wall like other clubs have, plus they want the franchise spot, and this will make the decision easier on them Not strictly true. Gateshead were an expansion team and both them and Sheffield were sacrificed for teams within the M62 corridor. |
|
| Author: | Sheldon [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 6:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wakefield |
The rfl should have never scrapped the 50% rule. Clubs are spending beyond their means. |
|
| Author: | Gordon Gekko [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wakefield |
Sheldon wrote:The rfl should have never scrapped the 50% rule. Clubs are spending beyond their means. Yup. Couldn't agree more. |
|
| Author: | General Zod. [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wakefield |
Another point of view is that Wakey have had 12 years in Super League and should have really got their act together by now. It's a shame cos they have a bigger catchment area than Cas and could have been a decent competitive club had they taken advantage when the economy was in better shape and got a stadium sorted back then. |
|
| Author: | pugwash pal [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wakefield |
As for Wakefield I am truly gutted. I hope they are saved and do not have to drop out of SL to keep a crap team from London or Wales in. Edit R.B.A |
|
| Author: | Anakin Skywalker [ Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wakefield |
As for Wakefield I am truly gutted. I hope they are saved and do not have to drop out of SL to keep a crap team from London or Wales in. FFS and people wonder why some trolls love this board
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|