WWW.RLFANS.COM :: View topic

Roverswall wrote:baderus should never have been banned anyway.
All he had to do was show video's of the other spear tackle in the same game then show his tackle followed by saying 'I get one game and the other one doesn't WTF'.
That would have left the RFL with nowhere at all to go but to let him off.
If they still got snippy he could then have showed the spear tackle in the last derby and said 'And this one didn't even come in front of you are you taking the whizz?'.
This is where the RFL have to be very careful as they are so inconsistant if they are not careful they will have players getting off due to their previous leniency.
Its gunna be 'Well look at this last week and tell me why I get banned and he didnt?'

Author:	gingerspice [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:15 am ]
Post subject:	RFL Decisions
What are the RFL exactly playing at one minute your banned the next your not, now Baderus as got off scot free, why do they bother to hold these disciplinaries when they mean sweet FA.........

Author:	Sandro II Terrorista [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:21 am ]
Post subject:	Re: RFL Decisions
That Baderus is a real bad ass. Shouldn't have been let off, almost as bad as Clint Newton.

Author:	EAST HULL RED [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:27 am ]
Post subject:	Re: RFL Decisions
Someone told me the other day that no one has ever been banned for a play-off game. I don't know how true it is, can anyone shed any light on it?

Author:	Bertie [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: RFL Decisions
EAST HULL RED wrote:Someone told me the other day that no one has ever been banned for a play-off game. I don't know how true it is, can anyone shed any light on it? Don't know about a play off game but things have certainly changed over the years as our ex player John Taylor will confirm....who missed his chance of playing at Wembley in a Challenge Cup Final because of a ban.

Author:	batesylufc [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: RFL Decisions
hes got a good record and they only view the incident from one camera angle but when a player appeals they show more angles and tbh it was wrong to ban him in the first place it was careless but not intentional and also would of been uproar if he was banned and tomkins gets away with nothing, good luck on friday beat those pies and shut them all up all they have said all year is their the best and nobody can stop them this year

WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/

RFL Decisions https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=471180	Page 1 of 1

Author:	barton baird [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:56 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: RFL Decisions
pmh wrote:That Baderus is a real bad ass. Shouldn't have been let off, almost as bad as Clint Newton. Baderus is nowhere near Newton for winding us up.

Author:	Bobbin' Along [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:04 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: RFL Decisions
It's Newton's fault Baderus is a wrongly spelled.

Author:	barton baird [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:17 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: RFL Decisions
Bobbin' Along wrote:It's Newton's fault Baderus is a wrongly spelled. He`s as baderus then?

Author:	Anakin Skywalker [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:04 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: RFL Decisions
baderus should never have been banned anyway. All he had to do was show video's of the other spear tackle in the same game then show his tackle followed by saying 'I get one game and the other one doesn't WTF'. That would have left the RFL with nowhere at all to go but to let him off. If they still got snippy he could then have showed the spear tackle in the last derby and said 'And this one didn't even come in front of you are you taking the whizz?'. This is where the RFL have to be very careful as they are so inconsistant if they are not careful they will have players getting off due to their previous leniency. Its gunna be 'Well look at this last week and tell me why I get banned and he didnt?'

Author:	Without A Doubt [ Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:40 am ]
Post subject:	Re: RFL Decisions
Roverswall wrote:baderus should never have been banned anyway. All he had to do was show video's of the other spear tackle in the same game then show his tackle followed by saying 'I get one game and the other one doesn't WTF'. That would have left the RFL with nowhere at all to go but to let him off. If they still got snippy he could then have showed the spear tackle in the last derby and said 'And this one didn't even come in front of you are you taking the whizz?'. This is where the RFL have to be very careful as they are so inconsistant if they are not careful they will have players getting off due to their previous leniency. Its gunna be 'Well look at this last week and tell me why I get banned and he didnt?' They could have pointed him at Jordan Tansey's spear tackle against the Crusaders - straight red followed by a 2 match ban!! The laws should be easy to apply with set penalties - no exceptions - it's a complete lottery at the moment.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/