WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

40-20's
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=470585
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Anakin Skywalker [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 8:40 am ]
Post subject:  40-20's

The fact we hardly ever convert them is becoming a worry.
We dont use the upper hand enough in that situation and I have no idea why.
Put it this way when dobson kicked it I looked straight to my wife and said 'well we wont score here we never do'.
Possibly having Willie running out wide in the open spaces that a scrum creates may well be the diffrence.

Author:  Gavin Miller - Legend [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 40-20's

Its not that big a problem to me.
It means you are in good field position and not draining energy defending although i do understand why you make the point.
Dobbo is the 40 / 20 King of Super League :BOW:

Author:  Captain Dave [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 40-20's

As JM often points out , we don't need to score on every set - it's about building and maintaining pressure to get the ascendancy.

Although it is good to see a score straight from a scrum.

Author:  ChampagneSuperRovers [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 40-20's

Anyone else think 40/20's look too easy?

If Roger Millward was playing today, he'd get one every set!

:D

Author:  tonylRobin [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 40-20's

if they were that easy to kick then why wouldnt everyone be kicking them?

Author:  Gavin Miller - Legend [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 40-20's

ChampagneSuperRovers wrote:Anyone else think 40/20's look too easy?

If Roger Millward was playing today, he'd get one every set!

:D



I bet Paul Harkin would be the best around for 40/20's if he played in this era.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/