WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
40-20's https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=470585 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Anakin Skywalker [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 8:40 am ] |
Post subject: | 40-20's |
The fact we hardly ever convert them is becoming a worry. We dont use the upper hand enough in that situation and I have no idea why. Put it this way when dobson kicked it I looked straight to my wife and said 'well we wont score here we never do'. Possibly having Willie running out wide in the open spaces that a scrum creates may well be the diffrence. |
Author: | Gavin Miller - Legend [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 40-20's |
Its not that big a problem to me. It means you are in good field position and not draining energy defending although i do understand why you make the point. Dobbo is the 40 / 20 King of Super League |
Author: | Captain Dave [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 40-20's |
As JM often points out , we don't need to score on every set - it's about building and maintaining pressure to get the ascendancy. Although it is good to see a score straight from a scrum. |
Author: | ChampagneSuperRovers [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 40-20's |
Anyone else think 40/20's look too easy? If Roger Millward was playing today, he'd get one every set! |
Author: | tonylRobin [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 40-20's |
if they were that easy to kick then why wouldnt everyone be kicking them? |
Author: | Gavin Miller - Legend [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 40-20's |
ChampagneSuperRovers wrote:Anyone else think 40/20's look too easy? If Roger Millward was playing today, he'd get one every set! I bet Paul Harkin would be the best around for 40/20's if he played in this era. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |