| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| de ja vue https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=461607 |
Page 1 of 5 |
| Author: | hkrdavidhkr [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | de ja vue |
ben thaler is the ref for wakefield vs hull kr last time he reffed this game was the now infamous penalty try, the only one to be awarded in sl history. can anybody guess what his hometown team is lol? i`ll give you a clue, it begins with "w" and ends with "d" and has "akefiel" in the middle. |
|
| Author: | Mild Rover [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: de ja vue |
There has only been one penalty try in SL history? |
|
| Author: | rover49 [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: de ja vue |
Mild Rover wrote:There has only been one penalty try in SL history? At the time it was awarded, it was the first. I don't know of any others, but saying that I have seen a hundred that were more deserving than the one he gave. |
|
| Author: | barham red [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: de ja vue |
rover49 wrote:At the time it was awarded, it was the first. I don't know of any others, but saying that I have seen a hundred that were more deserving than the one he gave. I'm sure there was one given last year against warrington, Briers kicked a ball out of an attackers hands as he was going to ground it and it was given as a pen try. |
|
| Author: | knocker norton [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: de ja vue |
rover49 wrote:At the time it was awarded, it was the first. I don't know of any others, but saying that I have seen a hundred that were more deserving than the one he gave. Wakefield were awarded a penalty try at Belle Vue against Hull FC around 2003/4 when Jason Smith obstructed one of their players chasing a kick through. Dont think Ben Thaler was the ref though... 
|
|
| Author: | ChampagneSuperRovers [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: de ja vue |
Was going to be enthused about the game, till I read this. Well I await this thread to be brought back around half 5 on Sunday. |
|
| Author: | Mild Rover [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:10 am ] | ||||
| Post subject: | Re: de ja vue | ||||
|
|||||
| Author: | hkrdavidhkr [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: de ja vue |
ok then... not the only penalty try then... |
|
| Author: | tonylRobin [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: de ja vue |
if we cut out the high shots and stupid 5th tackle penalties then we shouldnt even see the ref, its down to the players to do that, stop the pens stop the ref IMO. |
|
| Author: | rover49 [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: de ja vue |
tonylRobin wrote:if we cut out the high shots and stupid 5th tackle penalties then we shouldnt even see the ref, its down to the players to do that, stop the pens stop the ref IMO. Your joking, this is the bloke who gave a try as video ref when it was clear at least two players were 3 metres offside, one of which hit the defender without giving him 10 metres. If there is a way to screw us over, Thaler WILL find one. |
|
| Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|