WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

2 more years for Jake
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=460807
Page 1 of 5

Author:  MrPhilb [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:59 am ]
Post subject:  2 more years for Jake

http://www.hullkr.co.uk/article.php?id=1099


Good stuff, Our most dangerous back on his day
http://www.hullkr.co.uk/article.php?id=1099


Good stuff, Our most dangerous back on his day

Author:  rover49 [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2 more years for Jake

Galea will be off then I take it.

Author:  MrPhilb [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2 more years for Jake


Author:  berro's best mate [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2 more years for Jake

rover49 wrote:Galea will be off then I take it.

DOUBT IT, AINT YOU LOT ALLOWED 13 FOREIGNERS??

Author:  Sheldon [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2 more years for Jake

rover49 wrote:Galea will be off then I take it.


not if he can get a European passport.

Author:  barham red [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2 more years for Jake

berro's best mate wrote:DOUBT IT, AINT YOU LOT ALLOWED 13 FOREIGNERS??


you're running at full quota + Manu so think you'll find it exactly the same as us.

Author:  Roofs [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2 more years for Jake

Bad move IMO, seems to be getting even more injury-prone lately. :o Reckon would have been tempted to take a chance on a young centre (similar to Welham) personally.

Author:  Sheldon [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2 more years for Jake

Roofs wrote:Bad move IMO, seems to be getting even more injury-prone lately. :o Reckon would have been tempted to take a chance on a young centre (similar to Welham) personally.


the problem is who roofs?

Author:  Seventies red [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2 more years for Jake

Excellent news, very good player and we hav'nt seen the best of yet imo :D

Author:  Sandro II Terrorista [ Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2 more years for Jake

Roofs wrote:Bad move IMO, seems to be getting even more injury-prone lately. :o Reckon would have been tempted to take a chance on a young centre (similar to Welham) personally.


I agree, and not likely to improve with age. Webster is our most potent back, but for me there are other areas (ie stand off) that will need an Antipodean to fill.

Sheldon wrote:the problem is who roofs?


Ratu went okay on Sunday, full of enthusiasm, young and British. Not as good as Webster but looked solid in defence and only made one error (in not passing to Fox, but to be fair no one else does) going forward.

Page 1 of 5 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/