WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
Super League Legends? https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=454701 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | EAST HULL RED [ Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:15 pm ] | ||||
Post subject: | Super League Legends? | ||||
|
Author: | jimmyfivebellies [ Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:32 pm ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: Super League Legends? | ||||
|
Author: | barton baird [ Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Super League Legends? |
With all due respect,the word Legend is misused. It is actually defined as "A popular story handed down from earlier times whose truth has not been ascertained." So not wishing to pee on your bonfire,Rovers,or any other club for that matter ,hasn`t been in S.L. long enough to be legends. |
Author: | jimmyfivebellies [ Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Super League Legends? |
barton baird wrote:With all due respect,the word Legend is misused. It is actually defined as "A popular story handed down from earlier times whose truth has not been ascertained." So not wishing to pee on your bonfire,Rovers,or any other club for that matter ,hasn`t been in S.L. long enough to be legends. |
Author: | Roofs [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:44 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: Super League Legends? | ||||
|
Author: | barton baird [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Super League Legends? |
jimmyfivebellies wrote::CHILL: I`m fine thanks,I just like being a clever sod. |
Author: | Barnacle Bill [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Super League Legends? |
barton baird wrote:With all due respect,the word Legend is misused. It is actually defined as "A popular story handed down from earlier times whose truth has not been ascertained." So not wishing to pee on your bonfire,Rovers,or any other club for that matter ,hasn`t been in S.L. long enough to be legends. Surely, by your own definition, Rovers fit that bill. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |