WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

Walker Charged
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=450774		 Page 1 of 4
Author:  phil webbo [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Walker Charged
Author:  MrPhilb [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Walker Charged
1-2 matches is a joke, he should be looking at minimum 5
Author:  Big Dave T [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Walker Charged
MrPhilb wrote:1-2 matches is a joke, he should be looking at minimum 5


I'd say 6 or 7. (we play them on 15th May) :wink: :D
Author:  Rupert Pupkin [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Walker Charged
I thought it was pretty bad and due to the seriousness of the injury he deserves a far bigger ban!
Author:  phil webbo [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Walker Charged
MrPhilb wrote:1-2 matches is a joke, he should be looking at minimum 5


TBF Phil just looked at the operation guidlines, and it states that.

2.3.4. Injury
-If the misconduct has caused injury to an opponent, this may result in a higher penalty than if no injury had occured.
- Panels may consider the length of time an injured opponent is likely to be out of the game when passing sentence.

So not 1-2 then thats just the guidline.
Author:  JDTC [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Walker Charged
If found guilty, he will not be banned for the length of time Colbon is out injured. This never happens.

What about that talentless thug Ferriol, has he been charged for the cheap shot on Vella?
Author:  phil webbo [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Walker Charged
JDTC wrote:If found guilty, he will not be banned for the length of time Colbon is out injured. This never happens.

What about that talentless thug Ferriol, has he been charged for the cheap shot on Vella?

NO :shock:
http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1710

Apparently legal to tackle someone without the ball now :THINK:
JDTC wrote:If found guilty, he will not be banned for the length of time Colbon is out injured. This never happens.

What about that talentless thug Ferriol, has he been charged for the cheap shot on Vella?

NO :shock:
http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1710

Apparently legal to tackle someone without the ball now :THINK:
Author:  Gordon Gekko [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Walker Charged
phil webbo wrote:NO :shock:
http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1710

Apparently legal to tackle someone without the ball now :THINK:


The pitfalls of being a dummy runner. :)

Is the charge against Walker deffo the one that resulted in Colbons injury?? The time of the incident (69 mins) doesn't tally with the actual time of Rovers 2nd try.
phil webbo wrote:NO :shock:
http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1710

Apparently legal to tackle someone without the ball now :THINK:


The pitfalls of being a dummy runner. :)

Is the charge against Walker deffo the one that resulted in Colbons injury?? The time of the incident (69 mins) doesn't tally with the actual time of Rovers 2nd try.
Author:  phil webbo [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Walker Charged
Gordon Gekko wrote:The pitfalls of being a dummy runner. :)

Is the charge against Walker deffo the one that resulted in Colbons injury?? The time of the incident (69 mins) doesn't tally with the actual time of Rovers 2nd try.


I know, the incident happened at 74 mins
Maybe he banjo'd him earlier :BEAT:
Or maybe the RFL are using Alex Fergusons watch.
Author:  Hutchie [ Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Walker Charged
Gordon Gekko wrote:The pitfalls of being a dummy runner. :)

Is the charge against Walker deffo the one that resulted in Colbons injury?? The time of the incident (69 mins) doesn't tally with the actual time of Rovers 2nd try.



Thats because theres an hours time differnce to us ;)
Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/