| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| unexceptable https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=445966 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | rednwhite [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | unexceptable |
same side same names from last season barring 3 additions. Not good enough lads sort it out justin!!! |
|
| Author: | Scott_HKR [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: unexceptable |
did you actually mean unexcpectable as in you didn't expect that.... or did you mean unacceptable as in what today's performance was... |
|
| Author: | dboy [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: unexceptable |
Scott_HKR wrote:did you actually mean unexcpectable as in you didn't expect that.... or did you mean unacceptable as in what today's performance was... Classic! If you are gonna take the P over someones spelling, at least get it right yourself. |
|
| Author: | coyleahkr [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: unexceptable |
Justin will never admit he is wrong!Murrell not quick enough for sl hooker,Welham never a sl quality centre,attack to predictable and thats just for starters. |
|
| Author: | Basil Fawlty [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: unexceptable |
At the end of the day - we was crap today and the Giants are a much better team. Not looking good - No panic buttons, just very poor - two weeks running now!!!! |
|
| Author: | Scott_HKR [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: unexceptable |
dboy wrote:Classic! If you are gonna take the P over someones spelling, at least get it right yourself. Lol, I was actually been serious. But thanks lol |
|
| Author: | KC BRI [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: unexceptable |
Basil Fawlty wrote:At the end of the day - we was crap today and the Giants are a much better team. Huddersfield will be very close to winning silverware so its not that shock a result.
Not looking good - No panic buttons, just very poor - two weeks running now!!!! |
|
| Author: | rednwhite [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: unexceptable |
Scott_HKR wrote:did you actually mean unexcpectable as in you didn't expect that.... yes scott i did mean unacceptable as in todays performanceor did you mean unacceptable as in what today's performance was... but i have a learning disability called dyspraxia and have difficulty in spelling sometimes RNW |
|
| Author: | Gavin Miller - Legend [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: unexceptable |
To lose to a team of the quality of Hudds is not unexceptable. The manner of some of the tries conceded certainly was though. 1st Try - Lunt picks the ball up from Dummy Half and a gap opens up for him to coast through. 3rd Try - Patrick runs in from 40 metres swatting off defenders. 4th Try - Identical to the Interception conceded v Salford. Dobson needs to stop trying to put out a killer pass. Tries 2 and 6 were Brett Hodgson at his best but we stood off him and allowed it to happen and Gilmour was in far too much space for Try 5 and had a simple job of sending D Hodgson in. |
|
| Author: | rednwhite [ Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: unexceptable |
Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:To lose to a team of the quality of Hudds is not unexceptable. couldnt agree more.
The manner of some of the tries conceded certainly was though. 1st Try - Lunt picks the ball up from Dummy Half and a gap opens up for him to coast through. 3rd Try - Patrick runs in from 40 metres swatting off defenders. 4th Try - Identical to the Interception conceded v Salford. Dobson needs to stop trying to put out a killer pass. Tries 2 and 6 were Brett Hodgson at his best but we stood off him and allowed it to happen and Gilmour was in far too much space for Try 5 and had a simple job of sending D Hodgson in. |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|