WWW.RLFANS.COM :: View topic - Clinton to sign for St.Helens

insider knowledge wrote:Everyone I talk to say he is already signed for us subject to visa/work permit been granted, even announced on local radio I believe. Only slight niggle in my mind is that Hull Daily Mail said on Tuesday that the signing would be confirmed by the end of the week and I have not heard of the confirmation yet. I think we are just awaiting the visa stuff before making the definitely signed announcement. Can't really see us been trumped by a team on the decline like Saints.

insider knowledge wrote:Everyone I talk to say he is already signed for us subject to visa/work permit been granted, even announced on local radio I believe. Only slight niggle in my mind is that Hull Daily Mail said on Tuesday that the signing would be confirmed by the end of the week and I have not heard of the confirmation yet. I think we are just awaiting the visa stuff before making the definitely signed announcement. Can't really see us been trumped by a team on the decline like Saints.

fcimp wrote:Why? Are they losing money hand over fist at the same rate you are? Potential signings will look at the stability of the club and wonder if they will be getting paid further down the line.

fcimp wrote:Why? Are they losing money hand over fist at the same rate you are? Potential signings will look at the stability of the club and wonder if they will be getting paid further down the line.

Quote:Right, accounts filed for 2008: Leeds is a subsidiary of Caddick, so no separately filed information, but understand they make a profit.

Hull FC PROFIT £185,000

Bradford - Loss £17,000
Warrington - Loss £212,000
Cas - Loss £369,000
Saints - Loss £449,000
Rovers (2007) Loss £478,000
Wigan - Loss £592,000 (although debt they owed being written off of £1,175,000 gave them a net profit of £444,000)
Salford - Loss £832,000 (underwritten by Wilkinson)
Huddersfield - Loss £1,377,000 (underwritten by Ken Davy)
Harlequins - Loss £1,819,000 (underwritten by Lenegan and D Hughes)

The Goroka Gene-ius wrote:Yes they are:

Big loss considering they made both Wembley & Old Trafford duing the period.

Next. :lol:

The Goroka Gene-ius wrote:Yes they are:

Big loss considering they made both Wembley & Old Trafford duing the period.

Next. :lol:

fcimp wrote:Ok, but they are getting a new stadium which traditionally boosts a teams finances and they still are considered one of the best sides in RL and on that reputation will still attract players over a team with not much to offer like yourselves.

Author:	shagnasty [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:00 pm ]
Post subject:	Clinton to sign for St.Helens
Announced Monday

Author:	insider knowledge [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:29 pm ]
Post subject:
Everyone I talk to say he is already signed for us subject to visa/work permit been granted, even announced on local radio I believe. Only slight niggle in my mind is that Hull Daily Mail said on Tuesday that the signing would be confirmed by the end of the week and I have not heard of the confirmation yet. I think we are just awaiting the visa stuff before making the definitely signed announcement. Can't really see us been trumped by a team on the decline like Saints.

Author:	Sandro II Terrorista [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:35 pm ]
Post subject:
insider knowledge wrote:Everyone I talk to say he is already signed for us subject to visa/work permit been granted, even announced on local radio I believe. Only slight niggle in my mind is that Hull Daily Mail said on Tuesday that the signing would be confirmed by the end of the week and I have not heard of the confirmation yet. I think we are just awaiting the visa stuff before making the definitely signed announcement. Can't really see us been trumped by a team on the decline like Saints. Do not feed the troll.

Author:	fcimp [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 8:44 pm ]
Post subject:
insider knowledge wrote:Everyone I talk to say he is already signed for us subject to visa/work permit been granted, even announced on local radio I believe. Only slight niggle in my mind is that Hull Daily Mail said on Tuesday that the signing would be confirmed by the end of the week and I have not heard of the confirmation yet. I think we are just awaiting the visa stuff before making the definitely signed announcement. Can't really see us been trumped by a team on the decline like Saints. Why? Are they losing money hand over fist at the same rate you are? Potential signings will look at the stability of the club and wonder if they will be getting paid further down the line.

Author:	red al [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 8:50 pm ]
Post subject:
[quote="fcimp"]Why? Are they losing money hand over fist at the same rate you are? Potential signings will look at the stability of the club and wonder if they will be getting paid further down the line.[/quote] or sit on their arris at home instead, value for money or what!

WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/

Clinton to sign for St.Helens https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=438643	Page 1 of 2

Author:	joburg [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 8:52 pm ]
Post subject:
fcimp wrote:Why? Are they losing money hand over fist at the same rate you are? Potential signings will look at the stability of the club and wonder if they will be getting paid further down the line. Yes and have been for years, common knowledge

Author:	SirStan [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 9:03 pm ]
Post subject:
fcimp wrote:Why? Are they losing money hand over fist at the same rate you are? Potential signings will look at the stability of the club and wonder if they will be getting paid further down the line. Yes they are: Quote:Right, accounts filed for 2008: Leeds is a subsidiary of Caddick, so no separately filed information, but understand they make a profit. Hull FC PROFIT £185,000 Bradford - Loss £17,000 Warrington - Loss £212,000 Cas - Loss £369,000 Saints - Loss £449,000 Rovers (2007) Loss £478,000 Wigan - Loss £592,000 (although debt they owed being written off of £1,175,000 gave them a net profit of £444,000) Salford - Loss £832,000 (underwritten by Wilkinson) Huddersfield - Loss £1,377,000 (underwritten by Ken Davy) Harlequins - Loss £1,819,000 (underwritten by Lenegan and D Hughes) Big loss considering they made both Wembley & Old Trafford duing the period. Next.

Author:	hkrovers [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 9:20 pm ]
Post subject:
The Goroka Gene-ius wrote:Yes they are: Big loss considering they made both Wembley & Old Trafford duing the period. Next. And have not had to pay for any ground improvements as yet the same as warrington,cas,wigan,salford.hudds and quins but most of them lost more money than rovers

Author:	fcimp [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 9:22 pm ]
Post subject:
The Goroka Gene-ius wrote:Yes they are: Big loss considering they made both Wembley & Old Trafford duing the period. Next. Ok, but they are getting a new stadium which traditionally boosts a teams finances and they still are considered one of the best sides in RL and on that reputation will still attract players over a team with not much to offer like yourselves.

Author:	red al [ Fri Dec 04, 2009 9:23 pm ]
Post subject:
fcimp wrote:Ok, but they are getting a new stadium which traditionally boosts a teams finances and they still are considered one of the best sides in RL and on that reputation will still attract players over a team with not much to offer like yourselves. or a bottom 3 side.

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/