WWW.RLFANS.COM :: View topic

blakeysrobin wrote:Attendance at Saints tonight.
This collective attendance and sharing out has scrambled some accountants brains. :lol:

Or is it Leeds and Saints fans are so confident they are saving up for OT.

Mrs Barista wrote:Nowt left to share out after costs of hosting the games, Hudgell's already said there's no money in the play-offs (apart from the merchandise, I'm sure you've already got your case of Rovers play-off wine for £76) :wink:

blakeysrobin wrote:Why having a glass now.
A fruity number with the smell of success and an after taste of smugness. :wink:

cheeky charlie wrote:As well as been a pathological liar , you are so obsessed with Rovers finances, why the wink after the post ? as when people comment on your posts you justify them by saying because you "winked" it was tounge in cheek, the Rovers whine ( sorry wine :lol:

), is on the official Rovers site, so why the wink?.

Finance is your occupation or so you lead us to belief, Rovers are your obsession, you seem to let the two influence your life, it's an obsession with you, get a boyfriend play hide the sausage you are obviously frustrated babycakes :lol:

Why are you concerned about Rovers finances?, you are a lonely individual Barista , and stop the PM's trying to convince me you are an accountant :lol: :lol:

Mrs Barista wrote:Success? (that we made the playoffs) Do keep up. FC came second in a major final last year and were clearly labelled "LOSERS" on here. For consistency there can be no claims of success until the SL trophy is in the cabinet at Craven/Parasol Park. As for play-off smugness,(in that we were and you werent. Do keep up!) is conceding 8 tries and scoring 1 off a dubious penalty really sufficient grounds? :wink:

Mrs Barista wrote:I've never sent you a PM on this topic and have yet to see the one I allegedly sent you.

cheeky charlie wrote:See you chose to only reply to part of my original post :wink:

Author:	blakeysrobin [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:18 pm ]
Post subject:	6157
Attendance at Saints tonight. This collective attendance and sharing out has scrambled some accountants brains. Or is it Leeds and Saints fans are so confident they are saving up for OT.

Author:	Mrs Barista [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:22 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 6157
blakeysrobin wrote:Attendance at Saints tonight. This collective attendance and sharing out has scrambled some accountants brains. Or is it Leeds and Saints fans are so confident they are saving up for OT. Nowt left to share out after costs of hosting the games, Hudgell's already said there's no money in the play-offs (apart from the merchandise, I'm sure you've already got your case of Rovers play-off wine for £76)

Author:	blakeysrobin [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:27 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 6157
Mrs Barista wrote:Nowt left to share out after costs of hosting the games, Hudgell's already said there's no money in the play-offs (apart from the merchandise, I'm sure you've already got your case of Rovers play-off wine for £76) Why having a glass now. A fruity number with the smell of success and an after taste of smugness.

Author:	RoversTrace [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:29 pm ]
Post subject:
Think we should have some special offers for next week, buy one get one free, kids free, etc. or maybe just a tenner to get in.

Author:	Mrs Barista [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 6157
blakeysrobin wrote:Why having a glass now. A fruity number with the smell of success and an after taste of smugness. Success? Do keep up. FC came second in a major final last year and were clearly labelled "LOSERS" on here. For consistency there can be no claims of success until the SL trophy is in the cabinet at Craven/Parasol Park. As for play-off smugness, is conceding 8 tries and scoring 1 off a dubious penalty really sufficient grounds?

WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/

6157 https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=430920	Page 1 of 5

Author:	cheeky charlie [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 6157
Mrs Barista wrote:Nowt left to share out after costs of hosting the games, Hudgell's already said there's no money in the play-offs (apart from the merchandise, I'm sure you've already got your case of Rovers play-off wine for £76) As well as been a pathological liar , you are so obsessed with Rovers finances, why the wink after the post ? as when people comment on your posts you justify them by saying because you "winked" it was tounge in cheek, the Rovers whine ( sorry wine ), is on the official Rovers site, so why the wink?. Finance is your occupation or so you lead us to belief, Rovers are your obsession, you seem to let the two influence your life, it's an obsession with you, get a boyfriend play hide the sausage you are obviously frustrated babycakes Why are you concerned about Rovers finances?, you are a lonely individual Barista , and stop the PM's trying to convince me you are an accountant

Author:	Mrs Barista [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:09 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 6157
cheeky charlie wrote:As well as been a pathological liar , you are so obsessed with Rovers finances, why the wink after the post ? as when people comment on your posts you justify them by saying because you "winked" it was tounge in cheek, the Rovers whine ( sorry wine ), is on the official Rovers site, so why the wink?. Finance is your occupation or so you lead us to belief, Rovers are your obsession, you seem to let the two influence your life, it's an obsession with you, get a boyfriend play hide the sausage you are obviously frustrated babycakes Why are you concerned about Rovers finances?, you are a lonely individual Barista , and stop the PM's trying to convince me you are an accountant :lol: I've never sent you a PM on this topic and have yet to see the one I allegedly sent you.

Author:	blakeysrobin [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:13 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 6157
Mrs Barista wrote:Success? (that we made the playoffs) Do keep up. FC came second in a major final last year and were clearly labelled "LOSERS" on here. For consistency there can be no claims of success until the SL trophy is in the cabinet at Craven/Parasol Park. As for play-off smugness,(in that we were and you werent. Do keep up!) is conceding 8 tries and scoring 1 off a dubious penalty really sufficient grounds?

Author:	Mrs Barista [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:34 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 6157
cheeky charlie wrote:See you chose to only reply to part of my original post See you keep fabricating stories about me sending you PMs about my accountancy qualifications, then failing to provide any evidence.

Page 1 of 5	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/