WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

Lee Gilmour.
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=416033		 Page 1 of 5
Author:  hullkrno20 [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Lee Gilmour.
have it on good authority that we will be signging him at the end of the season, also aparently talking to SIMON MANNERING.. any one else heared anything??
Author:  Dave K. [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Lee Gilmour.
hullkrno20 wrote:have it on good authority that we will be signging him at the end of the season, also aparently talking to SIMON MANNERING.. any one else heared anything??


I wouldnt have thought you would be targetting backrowers, I would have thought a hooker and a prop would be the positions you where after.
Author:  rover49 [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Lee Gilmour.
Dave K. wrote:I wouldnt have thought you would be targetting backrowers, I would have thought a hooker and a prop would be the positions you where after.


And I would agree, especially a ball handling prop.
Author:  Dnats Ynnepeerht [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Lee Gilmour.
rover49 wrote:And I would agree, especially a ball handling prop.


Have Kingy if you want. Although he doesnt do much ball handling these days, he keeps his hand speed well practised jugling pints
Author:  GJB [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:33 pm ]
Post subject: 
Can't see us signing two second rowers. Maybe one of them though.
Author:  Barnacle Bill [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:42 pm ]
Post subject: 
Might work if as someone stated before, Galea goes to loose man and Scott plays a utility/replacement hooker role.

Actually, if Stan is released at the end of this season then it makes even more sense. Scott would then play the kind of role Stan has been i.e. a utility forward replacement off the bench.

We have been found wanting against big packs this season e.g. Huddersfield and Warrington so there could be some logic in this.
Author:  The Hollywood Frasier [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:45 pm ]
Post subject: 
Luke Stuart was offered a 2 year deal by you before he signed a 1 year extension at Souths.
Author:  Wildmoose [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:54 pm ]
Post subject: 
Barnacle Bill wrote:Might work if as someone stated before, Galea goes to loose man and Scott plays a utility/replacement hooker role.

Actually, if Stan is released at the end of this season then it makes even more sense. Scott would then play the kind of role Stan has been i.e. a utility forward replacement off the bench.

We have been found wanting against big packs this season e.g. Huddersfield and Warrington so there could be some logic in this.


Can't see how Gilmour / Mannering would change this though. They're both lightweight mobile forwards.

Who are the likely departures then...Fitzy, Stan, Macca & Mills?

Fitzy...new hooker.

Stan...new outside back I reckon (Craig Hall?) with Chev moving full time into the pack, especially if Fitzys replacement is a hooker.

Macca...new prop.

Mills...not getting much game time, so don't think we'd bother with a new player tbh.

None of these 4 played on Saturday, so maybe a glimse of next season?
Author:  rover49 [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Lee Gilmour.
Dnats Ynnepeerht wrote:Have Kingy if you want. Although he doesnt do much ball handling these days, he keeps his hand speed well practised jugling pints


I hear he is nicknamed 'Burger' King these days :lol:

Much as I am sure JM is tempted by your kind offer, you can............ :wink:
Author:  Dnats Ynnepeerht [ Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Lee Gilmour.
rover49 wrote:I hear he is nicknamed 'Burger' King these days :lol:

Much as I am sure JM is tempted by your kind offer, you can............ :wink:


:D That nickname is quite tame compared to the names my mates refer to him as.

I'm sure Morgan would be tempted too, he played for GB once don't you know. :wink:
Page 1 of 5 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/