Joined: Jul 20 2008 Posts: 1484 Location: Warrington - East Hull Lad At Heart
Why was that given? There were continuous offences commited by the Leeds players and we get punished for it? So Fox commits it once and gets punished for it. It's pretty inconsistant refeering in my book, the only possible thing he could have done was warn both teams. Didn't think he had a word with both the captains though?
I cannot believe we won the penalty count either, but that's little reward with the major and decisive decisions going against us.
Still, very impressed again by Fox.
Stirlingshire Saint wrote: If HKR win at Saints, I will personally bare my backside on the town hall steps in Hull.
Stirlingshire Saint wrote:
In summary, HKR are made up of of a few overrated foreigners, a couple of Wigan rejects and a couple of blokes I have never heard of.
Saints by plenty, by miles even!
Stirlingshire Saint wrote: A walkover for Saints.
HKR are about as poor as it gets.
When referring to the atmosphere of the HJ...
Wire On The Telly wrote: ...
Shame it doesn't keep the sound like the full east stand of HKR. That's atmosphere.
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
BringBackRugbyLeagueBiff wrote:Why was that given? There were continuous offences commited by the Leeds players and we get punished for it? So Fox commits it once and gets punished for it. It's pretty inconsistant refeering in my book, the only possible thing he could have done was warn both teams. Didn't think he had a word with both the captains though?
I cannot believe we won the penalty count either, but that's little reward with the major and decisive decisions going against us.
Still, very impressed again by Fox.
Fox got done for a professional foul (and correctly so) not persistent offside/laying on.
I have no idea how you can moan about the ref. Bentham did his level best to hand you the game on a plate.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Joined: Jul 20 2008 Posts: 1484 Location: Warrington - East Hull Lad At Heart
Kosh wrote:Fox got done for a professional foul (and correctly so) not persistent offside/laying on.
I have no idea how you can moan about the ref. Bentham did his level best to hand you the game on a plate.
That's a bit OTT, granted he gave us more penalties then Leeds yes.
The major decision was ruled out from Ian Smith!
Also, you don't think Sinfield or one or 2 other Leeds players should have been given 10mins for 'persistantly offending'?
Stirlingshire Saint wrote: If HKR win at Saints, I will personally bare my backside on the town hall steps in Hull.
Stirlingshire Saint wrote:
In summary, HKR are made up of of a few overrated foreigners, a couple of Wigan rejects and a couple of blokes I have never heard of.
Saints by plenty, by miles even!
Stirlingshire Saint wrote: A walkover for Saints.
HKR are about as poor as it gets.
When referring to the atmosphere of the HJ...
Wire On The Telly wrote: ...
Shame it doesn't keep the sound like the full east stand of HKR. That's atmosphere.
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
BringBackRugbyLeagueBiff wrote:That's a bit OTT, granted he gave us more penalties then Leeds yes.
The major decision was ruled out from Ian Smith!
Also, you don't think Sinfield or one or 2 other Leeds players should have been given 10mins for 'persistantly offending'?
TBH in one respect it was quite refreshing to see Leeds pulled up for offside so regularly when they usually get away with it.
However, I don't think Bentham was consistent and should have penalised Rovers more for interference. Generally he just seemed to spot every infringement from Leeds but let similar play from Rovers pass.
As far as more sin-bins are concerned - the one did the trick.
If by 'major decision' you mean the Webster knock-on, that was correctly given by the VR.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Joined: Apr 03 2006 Posts: 1438 Location: In the Zone
He deserved it professional foul end for stopping Mcguire quick play the ball...correct decision...i don't know can't even beat a depleated Leeds outfit while having the ref on your side also......oh dear!
The small badge on the front will always be bigger than the name on the back
Joined: Mar 25 2008 Posts: 3679 Location: God's county
Kosh wrote:TBH in one respect it was quite refreshing to see Leeds pulled up for offside so regularly when they usually get away with it.
However, I don't think Bentham was consistent and should have penalised Rovers more for interference. Generally he just seemed to spot every infringement from Leeds but let similar play from Rovers pass.
As far as more sin-bins are concerned - the one did the trick.
If by 'major decision' you mean the Webster knock-on, that was correctly given by the VR.
You can't give a balanced view of that considering the cameras tend to only focus on the ptb. If it showed the defensive line you may think differently.
What immortal hand or eye, Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?
Professional foul ten metres out. Had to go to the bin. bentham was shocking though and hammered leeds in the penalty count. It got even worse after sinfield's hissy fit in the 1st half
Joined: Nov 21 2007 Posts: 1565 Location: East hull
Kosh wrote:TBH in one respect it was quite refreshing to see Leeds pulled up for offside so regularly when they usually get away with it.
However, I don't think Bentham was consistent and should have penalised Rovers more for interference. Generally he just seemed to spot every infringement from Leeds but let similar play from Rovers pass.
As far as more sin-bins are concerned - the one did the trick.
If by 'major decision' you mean the Webster knock-on, that was correctly given by the VR.
Thaught Bentham had a decent game to be honest and yes the vr ruled out the Webster effort and rightly so there was definately a cheeky little knock on in there
Jake the Peg wrote:Professional foul ten metres out. Had to go to the bin. bentham was shocking though and hammered leeds in the penalty count. It got even worse after sinfield's hissy fit in the 1st half
BringBackRugbyLeagueBiff wrote:Why was that given? There were continuous offences commited by the Leeds players and we get punished for it? So Fox commits it once and gets punished for it. It's pretty inconsistant refeering in my book, the only possible thing he could have done was warn both teams. Didn't think he had a word with both the captains though?
I cannot believe we won the penalty count either, but that's little reward with the major and decisive decisions going against us.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
