WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

Walker Ban Upheld
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=395233		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Arise Sir Justin [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Walker Ban Upheld
Author:  bob bob bobin robin [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:05 pm ]
Post subject: 
No real surprise there then. Lets move on now and focus on friday, not exactly too bad having the likes of Webster stepping in to replace him is it.
Author:  cbr1100xx [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:06 pm ]
Post subject: 
We've seen it all before :roll:
Author:  Hutchie [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
I doubt very much you was at Odsal Hutchie so cut out the wind ups.
GML.
Author:  Seventies red [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:34 pm ]
Post subject: 
bob bob bobin robin wrote:No real surprise there then. Lets move on now and focus on friday, not exactly too bad having the likes of Webster stepping in to replace him is it.


With regards to the ban of Chev walker been upheld,
the inconsistencies that were evident last year by the RFL show no signs of receeding, it realy is about time they got their house in order and at least try to show some consistency when punishuing players for so called bad tackles.
It will be interesting to see what punishments are given out when Leeds or st Helens players are up in front of the pannel.
Once again the RFL at red hall have shown themselves to be the laughing stock of sport.
Rugby league, is the best sport in the world but unfortunately its still run by muppets,
:x :CRAZY:
Author:  EL CAMO [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
Although Chev has looked good so far this season this is by no means a big problem.
Who can complain at having to play Jake Webster?
Author:  tonylRobin [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:37 pm ]
Post subject: 
Seventies red wrote:With regards to the ban of Chev walker been upheld,
the inconsistencies that were evident last year by the RFL show no signs of receeding, it realy is about time they got their house in order and at least try to show some consistency when punishuing players for so called bad tackles.
It will be interesting to see what punishments are given out when Leeds or st Helens players are up in front of the pannel.
Once again the RFL at red hall have shown themselves to be the laughing stock of sport.
Rugby league, is the best sport in the world but unfortunately its still run by muppets,
:x :CRAZY:


what about the Leeds/Celtic brawl??? anyone punished for all the striking there? thought not.
Author:  Rover in Oz [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:05 pm ]
Post subject: 
Hull KR have certainly made huge strides when one GB international is replaced by a NZ international with a cracking top class local lad putting pressure on both of them for a starting berth.
Author:  Irregs#16 [ Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:29 am ]
Post subject: 
Seventies red wrote:With regards to the ban of Chev walker been upheld,
the inconsistencies that were evident last year by the RFL show no signs of receeding, it realy is about time they got their house in order and at least try to show some consistency when punishuing players for so called bad tackles.
It will be interesting to see what punishments are given out when Leeds or st Helens players are up in front of the pannel.
Once again the RFL at red hall have shown themselves to be the laughing stock of sport.
Rugby league, is the best sport in the world but unfortunately its still run by muppets,
:x :CRAZY:


This link was posted on the VT. Kind of goes against your opinion, but lets not let the facts get in the way
Author:  trys'r'us [ Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:43 pm ]
Post subject: 
Irregs #16 wrote:This link was posted on the VT. Kind of goes against your opinion, but lets not let the facts get in the way


Courtesy of Gazemous:

Percentage of games banned for in relation to players referred to disciplinary panel:

Wakefield - 4 times referred, 8 matches banned: 200%
Castleford - 5 times referred, 8 matches banned: 160%
Wigan - 12 times referred, 12 matches banned: 100%
St Helens - 3 times referred, 3 matches banned: 100%
Quins - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89%
Catalans - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89%
Hudds - 7 times referred, 6 matches banned: 86%
Warrington - 10 times referred, 8 matches banned: 80%
Leeds - 8 times referred, 5 matches banned: 63%
Bradford - 5 times referred, 3 matches banned: 60%
Hull KR - 11 times referred, 4 matches banned: 36%
Hull FC - 2 times referred, 0 matches banned: 0%
Irregs #16 wrote:This link was posted on the VT. Kind of goes against your opinion, but lets not let the facts get in the way


Courtesy of Gazemous:

Percentage of games banned for in relation to players referred to disciplinary panel:

Wakefield - 4 times referred, 8 matches banned: 200%
Castleford - 5 times referred, 8 matches banned: 160%
Wigan - 12 times referred, 12 matches banned: 100%
St Helens - 3 times referred, 3 matches banned: 100%
Quins - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89%
Catalans - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89%
Hudds - 7 times referred, 6 matches banned: 86%
Warrington - 10 times referred, 8 matches banned: 80%
Leeds - 8 times referred, 5 matches banned: 63%
Bradford - 5 times referred, 3 matches banned: 60%
Hull KR - 11 times referred, 4 matches banned: 36%
Hull FC - 2 times referred, 0 matches banned: 0%
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/