Thread "drift" ?

Weren't they just? All luvved up tonight.




That was discussed. But you know how people are always demanding that referees behave consistently and apply the rules with common sense, even though the two are contradictory? This is flexible interpretation. Which is very differrent to hypocrisy.
More seriously, it is being monitored.



Booooo! Good night.

Behind the game as usual. On Thursday:

You need to get your own material.

"I'm going to give it everything to get to Lima... What doesn't kill [you], strengthens you," read his final tweet on his @jmboero account.
and then the lad died RIP.

Just highlights I don't really take much notice of anything you say really unless I can be bothered to read your posts as opposed to you who are like a moth to a lightbulb when I post.
Glad you share my view mind.
Be funny to dig up fawning posts about Rule over the last few years but I've far more interesting things to do and the breeze hold up on the darts has passed.

Quite, your posting frequency on here tonight is testimony to that. Not.

The thing about me is that I admit when I was wrong. I thought Rule did a good job in most areas apart from coaching appointment. Turns out that was completely wrong. You win some, you lose some, but have a bit of dignity in admitting it, for heaven's sake, otherwise you just look like a club apologist scared of critiquing anything your club does, even if they're the height of average. No credibility in that whatsoever.

Relieved that I was not Neil Hudgell's typist on an interactive web chat in November 2009 who documented that there may be news on the East Stand in the next 2 weeks and that the full benefits of Club Rovers would soon emerge and be understood fully. Oops. Whatever happened to those naive dreams?

Read back you will see it is always you who initially responds to anything I post.

Which part of when I can be bothered did you fail to understand?
Didn't think it was that difficult a statement to take in.
It's 2012 now, referring to information I posted on this forum in 2009 for Rovers fans to discuss regarding their club makes you appear kind of obsessed with anything I post and confirms my view.
Your amateur mind games will not result in this thread being locked just because the topic evolved onto the disgraceful antics behind the scences at Hull FC.
Putting a after something you have posted doesn't make it funny to anybody other then yourself by the way.

If you have a response to any of the above points send them to me directly via PM.
That way the posters can debate the thread and not have to read through your opinion on issues not connected to the thread such as posts i made in 2009.
If you wish to discuss Gleeson,Rule,Cooper and the bans or behaviours preceeding the bans you are welcome to do so on this thread

For clarification.

The thread was started by a leading question in which a couple of Hull FC fans correctly pinpointed that the lack of posters on this forum was due to Rovers supporters taking an interest in what was breaking news involving Gleeson,Rule and Cooper.
There are several threads across RL Fans on various boards discussing the matter.
In fact of the other 13 SL clubs forums it only fails to have a thread on 3 of them Catalans,London and Widnes.
This is the one for fans to use on the Rovers forum if they wish to discuss it.
This shows a consistant moderation approach with our colleagues from other clubs.

Got to say G.M.L. and Mrs B,the way you go at each other you are like an old married couple.

Questions regards moderation can be directed via PM.
Thanks.

He never asked a question