east hull FC fan wrote:Look Kosh, if you cant come up with an answer then fine.
And FYI, asking why the Crusaders should get a license above Wakefield is not me saying it's a straight choice between the two. Maybe if I'd asked why the Crusaders deserve a place above anybody in SL you wouldn't have got so uptight.
Do you always struggle with comprehension? Because I really didn't think that on the Rovers board it would be you I had to explain it to!
Oh the question is easy enough to answer. Crusaders should get a licence above Wakey if they submit a better licence application. Simples. Same applies to your more general question also.
But that isn't the answer you want nor the reason for your question. Deny it all you want, but every post of yours on this thread screams out that you've decided it's a straight fight between Crusaders and Wakey for the last SL 2012 spot and that the RFL are unfairly discriminating against Wakey.
Still waiting for evidence of that BTW. Shall I play your game and claim that your failure to answer is a sign of your inability to do so? I guess you could just bluster about how it's 'obvious' and anyone who pays attention to facts is just 'naive' again.
Anyway - this has been fun and all but today I'm busy, so feel free to have the last word.
TTFN.