Joined: Jun 11 2007 Posts: 12260 Location: south of Hull.
blakeysrobin wrote:yep but me and him agreed if it was fc or rovers it would be NO try. Why did bentham go to the screen for rovers try? it was a good try, but lets see if we can find something wrong with it.
Can`t argue with that one.
BLACK AND WHITES
East is East,West is West, and never the twain shall meet.
-------------------------------- "I" said the sparrow "With my bow and arrow."
blakeysrobin wrote:Dont reply. She doesnt like talking to herself.
Ahh, the master plan.
DANNY LOCKWOOD - LEAGUE WEEKLY (18-5-09)
I'M SURE THERE IS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN THE FACT THAT THE FRONT RUNNERS FOR THE 2009 MEDIA WHINGING AWARD ARE FROM GATESHEAD AND HULL FC, FORMERLY THE B*ST*RD-TWINS OF ONE OF RUGBY LEAGUE'S LOUSIER IDEAS.
Joined: Aug 24 2005 Posts: 15807 Location: East Hull
CHURCHILL wrote:There you go roof, she's stitched you up on this one, best to ignore, but I'm sure you won't. Another comment from you and she'll be straight back at you. Unless you have an ace up your sleeve to shut her up, although I doubt it.
Why are you taking offence at us taking offence?
"The Mail understands..." NOTHING!
[quote="-VIKINGMAN-"]Respect to Roofs, the president of East Hull. [/quote]
Roofs wrote:just don't see the point other then to wind people up.
Because that's the game. That's how it works.
DANNY LOCKWOOD - LEAGUE WEEKLY (18-5-09)
I'M SURE THERE IS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN THE FACT THAT THE FRONT RUNNERS FOR THE 2009 MEDIA WHINGING AWARD ARE FROM GATESHEAD AND HULL FC, FORMERLY THE B*ST*RD-TWINS OF ONE OF RUGBY LEAGUE'S LOUSIER IDEAS.
Roofs wrote:Why are you taking offence at us taking offence?
I'm not mate, just see the usual comments from the usual people regard Barista when it's those very people feeding the ego.
DANNY LOCKWOOD - LEAGUE WEEKLY (18-5-09)
I'M SURE THERE IS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN THE FACT THAT THE FRONT RUNNERS FOR THE 2009 MEDIA WHINGING AWARD ARE FROM GATESHEAD AND HULL FC, FORMERLY THE B*ST*RD-TWINS OF ONE OF RUGBY LEAGUE'S LOUSIER IDEAS.
oyster bay wrote:May be biased, but we think 'Garbage' is a little unfair describing Lovegrove -- his aim was to control Finch and Hoffman as best as he could and watching the game we feel he achieved that in the main. Seemed to be making tackle after takle mid to late first half, then got moved into the centres after Jake and Clinton went off injured and RH centre is hardly his preferred position. Seemed to us that Wigan were moving forward at the PTB and constantly offside. Also lots of silly mistakes fom.
Hoffman didnt need watching. If he was playing for Rovers I'd have subbed him and never let him return!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
to p!ss us of I think it's quite funny and like I said bizarre
